From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625CBC2BC61 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3278320870 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:42:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3278320870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=davemloft.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729847AbeJ3HdP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:33:15 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:41754 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729832AbeJ3HdO (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:33:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-67-183-62-245.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.183.62.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E9B413ADD5DB; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20181029.154226.179933039670602298.davem@davemloft.net> To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <097fb051-25e3-cdb6-570b-22c2e9f83861@linux.intel.com> References: <20181029183258.GL21857@kernel.org> <097fb051-25e3-cdb6-570b-22c2e9f83861@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Liang, Kan" Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:32:40 -0400 > - struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused) > + struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused, > + atomic_t *nr_rb_read __maybe_unused) > { What is going on with the indentations of this patch?