From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC226C6786F for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8002220664 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:15:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8002220664 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stgolabs.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728611AbeJaIKq (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 04:10:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48082 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727739AbeJaIKq (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 04:10:46 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F65DAF8A; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:15:06 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Vito Caputo Cc: Waiman Long , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: introduce /proc/stat2 file Message-ID: <20181030231506.fy3oix75rifimevv@linux-r8p5> References: <20181029192521.23059-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <0afed890-7c5a-93ee-cdb9-e30775bd9cf1@redhat.com> <20181029200050.iejuxckzbm742dmw@linux-r8p5> <3c5ba85b-5114-c751-0114-ac2cb64c02ea@redhat.com> <20181029203818.pot26ewxbncfrnua@linux-r8p5> <20181029212314.nwruqg6au23ebqlu@shells.gnugeneration.com> <20181030185756.w3f2trelb7nikgmk@linux-r8p5> <20181030224012.mgatj7ddhj3sefkv@shells.gnugeneration.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181030224012.mgatj7ddhj3sefkv@shells.gnugeneration.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Vito Caputo wrote: >If you create /proc/stat2 to omit interrupts, do we then create >/proc/stat3 to omit CPUs when just interrupts are of interest to the >application running on a 256-cpu machine? Be real, this is a bogus argument. As mentioned, stat2 is named as such because it's a replacement for a better common case, not some random increment. Thanks, Davidlohr