Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PMIC: xpower: fix IOSF_MBI dependency

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:06:43PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We still get a link failure with IOSF_MBI=m when the xpower driver
> is built-in:
> 
> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_xpower.o: In function `intel_xpower_pmic_update_power':
> intel_pmic_xpower.c:(.text+0x4f2): undefined reference to `iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access'
> intel_pmic_xpower.c:(.text+0x5e2): undefined reference to `iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access'
> 
> This makes the dependency stronger, so we can only build when IOSF_MBI
> is built-in.
> 
> Fixes: 6a9b593d4b6f ("ACPI / PMIC: xpower: Add depends on IOSF_MBI to Kconfig entry")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 18851e7eedd5..31a3c4a03f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ config CRC_PMIC_OPREGION
>  
>  config XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION
>  	bool "ACPI operation region support for XPower AXP288 PMIC"
> -	depends on MFD_AXP20X_I2C && IOSF_MBI
> +	depends on MFD_AXP20X_I2C && IOSF_MBI=y

To me sounds like

select IOSF_MBI would be more appropriate here.

>  	help
>  	  This config adds ACPI operation region support for XPower AXP288 PMIC.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko