From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4DEC32789 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E037206BA for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="HfLsV01S" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0E037206BA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730113AbeKUDSB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:18:01 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:36020 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726179AbeKUDSA (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:18:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AJu4NwmXEQnlGYXmdz5l0Qxidh9A0KBT6TBkBFc3oc4=; b=HfLsV01SxWWRAIlhV542RuTwt 5ogAaSQO9pDKL1AOTJPtV4CECRnb0S4jzAlj0ca8tQPaeMjJrsXYrDUWGRsohDBo164hHD+Bqd0F7 lNh7FFpo/GfAjbx6fXk+8ntfBOlfyaKPaipeYWcsyaTCuvYI1YulbzeaSjP98N6CEJyZ8=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gP9Br-0001oE-KI; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:47:55 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 158721124DC2; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:47:55 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:47:55 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Doug Anderson Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: core: add enable_count for consumers to debug fs" to the regulator tree Message-ID: <20181120164755.GL3894@sirena.org.uk> References: <20181120162808.B73391124DC2@debutante.sirena.org.uk> <20181120164125.GK3894@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WuT04sMzYDXq8et0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181120164125.GK3894@sirena.org.uk> X-Cookie: fortune: No such file or directory User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --WuT04sMzYDXq8et0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:41:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:37:04AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: >=20 > > Hold up! How does this compile for you? It looks as if you landed it > > before ("regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers") > > which is the patch that adds "enable_count" to the consumer structure. >=20 > > I'm just working on my replies to you about the dependencies on these > > patches but they're definitely not separate... >=20 > Dunno, but my script for applying things does a build after each patch > and didn't complain so... are you sure it's not e-mails getting > reordered? Wait, no - I didn't apply that but my tree does compile at the minute because my test config doesn't have debugfs enabled. If I turn that on then the relevant code gets built and I see an error. I'll drop this. This does, however, beg the question why this is a separate patch in the first place? --WuT04sMzYDXq8et0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlv0OroACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AMSwf/VXULShmTWXvm6feWe07WVyB5DsMzXzlauxQf9vmv82XPVCzzsES3uDhD Hfjcuj0CdndhGOZjEQ8gSl5GFfelhVEsbFsOdLgpU1EfZK1PkU3OHvBN3rbxf1Z+ tsUOr5+cuDGEndJgZU+lE6BJVhSdE5jyOWPAtd0bz0vMCJZpbY7GHto+dy0SXjpN imhxHJmsjBQiUWb2k3OHTSHeSf/rm4yqpaxbdIGVdIj93Ao+wRwYkp/96Vkfvsa5 y9P06bMCq3kO+2pISyG3RMz85Mb52jHXd9xIvZS7Zj7z0JADvXnXV3P9/hn4JJVH 7arCu1+dCSPofv0rmSHtvK38A+TF0g== =cujW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WuT04sMzYDXq8et0--