From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] thunderbolt: Prevent root port runtime suspend during NVM upgrade
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:59:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126105951.GE2296@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126104639.GA29089@kroah.com>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:47:46PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > During NVM upgrade process the host router is hot-removed for a short
> > while. During this time it is possible that the root port is moved into
> > D3cold which would be fine if the root port could trigger PME on itself.
> > However, many systems actually do not implement it so what happens is
> > that the root port goes into D3cold and never wakes up unless userspace
> > does PCI config space access, such as running 'lscpi'.
> >
> > For this reason we explicitly prevent the root port from runtime
> > suspending during NVM upgrade.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Is this a regression? If so, should it go to stable kernels?
It is not a regression.
> If not, and this never worked, should this just wait until 4.21-rc1?
Only reason I would like to have it included in v4.20 is that v4.20
started supporting PCI runtime PM for these systems so NVM upgrade would
then not work until v4.21.
But I'm fine either way and can send it to you later for v4.21 inclusion :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-26 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 9:47 [PATCH 0/1] thunderbolt: Fix for v4.20-rc5 Mika Westerberg
2018-11-26 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] thunderbolt: Prevent root port runtime suspend during NVM upgrade Mika Westerberg
2018-11-26 10:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-11-26 10:59 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181126105951.GE2296@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®