From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
strace-devel@lists.strace.io
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:04:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128130439.GB28206@altlinux.org> (raw)
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO lets ptracer obtain details of the syscall
the tracee is blocked in. The request succeeds when the tracee is in a
syscall-enter-stop, syscall-exit-stop or PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP stop,
and fails with -EINVAL otherwise.
There are two reasons for a special syscall-related ptrace request.
Firstly, with the current ptrace API there are cases when ptracer cannot
retrieve necessary information about syscalls. Some examples include:
* The notorious int-0x80-from-64-bit-task issue. See [1] for details.
In short, if a 64-bit task performs a syscall through int 0x80, its tracer
has no reliable means to find out that the syscall was, in fact,
a compat syscall, and misidentifies it.
* Syscall-enter-stop and syscall-exit-stop look the same for the tracer.
Common practice is to keep track of the sequence of ptrace-stops in order
not to mix the two syscall-stops up. But it is not as simple as it looks;
for example, strace had a (just recently fixed) long-standing bug where
attaching strace to a tracee that is performing the execve system call
led to the tracer identifying the following syscall-exit-stop as
syscall-enter-stop, which messed up all the state tracking.
* Since the introduction of commit 84d77d3f06e7e8dea057d10e8ec77ad71f721be3
("ptrace: Don't allow accessing an undumpable mm"), both PTRACE_PEEKDATA
and process_vm_readv become unavailable when the process dumpable flag
is cleared. On such architectures as ia64 this results in all syscall
arguments being unavailable.
Secondly, ptracers also have to support a lot of arch-specific code for
obtaining information about the tracee. For some architectures, this
requires a ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, ...) invocation for every syscall
argument and return value.
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO returns the following structure:
struct ptrace_syscall_info {
__u8 op; /* PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_* */
__u8 __pad0[3];
__u32 arch;
union {
struct {
__u64 nr;
__u64 instruction_pointer;
__u64 stack_pointer;
__u64 frame_pointer;
__u64 args[6];
} entry;
struct {
__s64 rval;
__u8 is_error;
__u8 __pad1[7];
} exit;
struct {
__u64 nr;
__u64 instruction_pointer;
__u64 stack_pointer;
__u64 frame_pointer;
__u64 args[6];
__u32 ret_data;
__u8 __pad2[4];
} seccomp;
};
};
The structure was chosen according to [2], except for the following
changes:
* arch is returned unconditionally to aid with tracing system calls such as
execve();
* the type of nr field was changed from int to __u64 because syscall
numbers are, as a practical matter, 64 bits;
* stack_pointer and frame_pointer fields were added along with
instruction_pointer field since they are readily available and can save
the tracer from extra PTRACE_GETREGSET calls;
* a boolean is_error field was added along with rval field, this way
the tracer can more reliably distinguish a return value
from an error value.
This changeset should be applied on top of [3] and [4].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFzcSVmdDj9Lh_gdbz1OzHyEm6ZrGPBDAJnywm2LF_eVyg@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAObL_7GM0n80N7J_DFw_eQyfLyzq+sf4y2AvsCCV88Tb3AwEHA@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181119210139.GA8360@altlinux.org/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181120001128.GA11300@altlinux.org/
v4:
* Re-split into two commits.
* Do not introduce task_struct.ptrace_event, use child->last_siginfo->si_code
instead.
* Implement PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP and ptrace_syscall_info.seccomp
support along with PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_{ENTRY,EXIT} and
ptrace_syscall_info.{entry,exit}.
v3:
* Split into three commits.
* Change struct ptrace_syscall_info.
* Support PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP by adding ptrace_event to task_struct.
* Add proper defines for ptrace_syscall_info.op values.
* Rename PT_SYSCALL_IS_ENTERING and PT_SYSCALL_IS_EXITING to
* PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY and PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT
* and move them to uapi.
v2:
* Do not use task->ptrace.
* Replace entry_info.is_compat with entry_info.arch, use syscall_get_arch().
* Use addr argument of sys_ptrace to get expected size of the struct;
return full size of the struct.
Elvira Khabirova (2):
ptrace: save the type of syscall-stop in ptrace_message
ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request
include/linux/tracehook.h | 9 ++--
include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h | 44 +++++++++++++++
kernel/ptrace.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
ldv
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 13:04 Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2018-11-28 13:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ptrace: save the type of syscall-stop in ptrace_message Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 13:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-28 14:05 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 14:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-28 15:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 22:11 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 23:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 10:34 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-29 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-29 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-29 21:10 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-30 11:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-30 22:53 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 13:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-28 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-28 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181128130439.GB28206@altlinux.org \
--to=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=lineprinter@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=strace-devel@lists.strace.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome