mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	jsperbeck@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Make /proc/sys inodes be owned by global root.
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:09:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130010928.GM4922@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1kzjdff.fsf@xmission.com>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:29:40PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes:
> > Thanks for the description of how to run into the issue described but
> > is there also a practical use case today where this is happening? I ask
> > as it would be good to know the severity of the issue in the real world
> > today.
> 
> People trying to run containers without a root user in the container.
> It atypical but something doable.  

My question was if there are generic tools / propreitary tools which are
doing this widely *today*. Or is this just a custom setup some folks
use?

> We spoke about this at LPC.  And this is the correct behavioral change.
> 
> The problem is there is a default value for i_uid and i_gid that is
> correct in the general case.  That default value is not corect for
> sysctl, because proc is weird.  As the sysctl permission check in
> test_perm are all against GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID we did not
> notice that i_uid and i_gid were being set wrong.
> 
> So all this patch does is fix the default values i_uid and i_gid.
> 
> The commit comment seems worth cleaning up.  But for the
> content of the code.

The logic seems sensible then, but are we implicating what a container
does with its sysctl values onto the entire system? If so, sure, it
seems you want this for networking purposes as there are a series of
sysctl values a container may want to muck with, but are we sure we
want the same for *all* sysctl entries?

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 17:26 Radoslaw Burny
2018-11-27  1:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-27  5:29   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-30  1:09     ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2018-11-30 13:46       ` Radoslaw Burny
2018-11-30 14:48       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-30 18:19         ` Luis Chamberlain
     [not found]     ` <CAFkxGoM_rjciQ0sRh7Lhf_XfJu-g4Tth6Yo0L_YRVUaOnzjZuA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-01 13:55       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181130010928.GM4922@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rburny@google.com \
    --cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®