From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jsperbeck@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Make /proc/sys inodes be owned by global root.
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:09:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130010928.GM4922@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1kzjdff.fsf@xmission.com>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:29:40PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes:
> > Thanks for the description of how to run into the issue described but
> > is there also a practical use case today where this is happening? I ask
> > as it would be good to know the severity of the issue in the real world
> > today.
>
> People trying to run containers without a root user in the container.
> It atypical but something doable.
My question was if there are generic tools / propreitary tools which are
doing this widely *today*. Or is this just a custom setup some folks
use?
> We spoke about this at LPC. And this is the correct behavioral change.
>
> The problem is there is a default value for i_uid and i_gid that is
> correct in the general case. That default value is not corect for
> sysctl, because proc is weird. As the sysctl permission check in
> test_perm are all against GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID we did not
> notice that i_uid and i_gid were being set wrong.
>
> So all this patch does is fix the default values i_uid and i_gid.
>
> The commit comment seems worth cleaning up. But for the
> content of the code.
The logic seems sensible then, but are we implicating what a container
does with its sysctl values onto the entire system? If so, sure, it
seems you want this for networking purposes as there are a series of
sysctl values a container may want to muck with, but are we sure we
want the same for *all* sysctl entries?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-30 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 17:26 Radoslaw Burny
2018-11-27 1:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-27 5:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-30 1:09 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2018-11-30 13:46 ` Radoslaw Burny
2018-11-30 14:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-30 18:19 ` Luis Chamberlain
[not found] ` <CAFkxGoM_rjciQ0sRh7Lhf_XfJu-g4Tth6Yo0L_YRVUaOnzjZuA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-01 13:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181130010928.GM4922@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rburny@google.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®