From: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
To: "airlied@gmail.com" <airlied@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/ast: Fix connector leak during driver unload
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:46:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203004618.GA11552@tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181130094108.GT21184@phenom.ffwll.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3932 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:41:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:17:51AM +1100, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:56:53AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:05 AM Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:40:53AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 15:59, Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When unloading the ast driver, a warning message is printed by
> > > > > > drm_mode_config_cleanup() because a reference is still held to one of
> > > > > > the drm_connector structs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Correct this by calling drm_framebuffer_remove() in
> > > > > > ast_fbdev_destroy().
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_fb.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_fb.c
> > > > > > index 0cd827e11fa2..655372ea81e9 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_fb.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_fb.c
> > > > > > @@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ static void ast_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct ast_framebuffer *afb = &afbdev->afb;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + /* drm_framebuffer_remove() expects us to hold a ref, which it
> > > > > > + * will drop, so take one: */
> > > > > > + drm_framebuffer_get(&afb->base);
> > > > > > + drm_framebuffer_remove(&afb->base);
> > > > >
> > > > > This doesn't seem corret, no other driver does this pattern, and I
> > > > > can't believe ast is special here.
> > > > >
> > > > > The get just doesn't make sense.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for having a look at this, as I said in the cover letter I was
> > > > concerned that it might not be a good fix.
> > > >
> > > > But the AST driver does seem to be special (or just old?) because it
> > > > embeds the drm_framebuffer directly into ast_fbdev and (almost all)
> > > > other drivers dynamically allocate and reference count theirs.
> > > >
> > > > The drm_framebuffer_get() certainly looks weird but it is there in order
> > > > to cause drm_framebuffer_remove() to call legacy_remove_fb(), which it
> > > > won't do unless the refcount is at least 2. (And because the
> > > > drm_framebuffer isn't dynamically allocated in this case we don't really
> > > > care about the reference count anyway.)
> > > >
> > > > An alternative might be to call legacy_remove_fb() directly, but it's
> > > > declared static. Do you think it would be better to expose it and call
> > > > it directly from the AST driver code? Or is there some other better way
> > > > to put the drm_connectors?
> > >
> > > Your problem isn't the dynamic fb vs. embedded fb for fbdev (you're
> > > already using drm_framebuffer_unregister_private to handle that). Your
> > > problem is you're not shutting down stuff on driver unload, which
> > > means the fb is still in use. drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() takes care
> > > of that for atomic drivers.
> > >
> > > No idea anymore what to do for legacy code, probably need to open code
> > > a shutdown sequence. Definitely not the above.
> > > -Daniel
> >
> > Well, it looks like drm_crtc_force_disable_all() would also do the job,
> > and from looking at nouveau_display_fini() it's used there as an
> > alternative to drm_atomic_helper_shutdown().
>
> Ah right, I tried looking for that one but didn't find it with a quick
> scan.
>
> > Would it be reasonable to call that at the start of
> > ast_fbdev_destroy() instead? (Testing shows that it does allow the
> > drm_connector to be released. Is it enough/correct though?)
>
> Yes.
> -Daniel
Great, I'll post a v2 with that change.
Cheers,
Sam.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 5:57 [PATCH 0/2] Two AST driver fixes Sam Bobroff
2018-11-05 5:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/ast: Fix incorrect free on ioregs Sam Bobroff
2018-11-05 5:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/ast: Fix connector leak during driver unload Sam Bobroff
2018-11-28 23:40 ` Dave Airlie
2018-11-29 2:00 ` Sam Bobroff
2018-11-29 8:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-30 0:17 ` Sam Bobroff
2018-11-30 9:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-03 0:46 ` Sam Bobroff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203004618.GA11552@tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®