From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Michael Rodin <michael@rodin.online>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH -tip] kprobes/x86: Fix to copy RIP relative instruction correctly
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:49:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204224958.30d1080d4c4e795953e1588f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204081335.GB67285@gmail.com>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:13:35 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Since copy_optimized_instructions() misses to update real RIP
> > address while copying several instructions to working buffer,
> > it adjusts RIP-relative instruction with wrong RIP address for
> > the 2nd and subsequent instructions.
> >
> > This may break the kernel (like kernel freeze) because
> > probed instruction can refer a wrong data. For example,
> > putting kprobes on cpumask_next hit this bug.
> >
> > cpumask_next is normally like below if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
> > (in this case nr_cpumask_bits is an alias of nr_cpu_ids)
> >
> > <cpumask_next>:
> > 48 89 f0 mov %rsi,%rax
> > 8b 35 7b fb e2 00 mov 0xe2fb7b(%rip),%esi
> > # ffffffff82db9e64 <nr_cpu_ids>
> > 55 push %rbp
> > ...
> >
> > If we put a kprobe on it and optimized with jump, it becomes
> > like this.
> >
> > e9 95 7d 07 1e jmpq 0xffffffffa000207a
> > 7b fb jnp 0xffffffff81f8a2e2 <cpumask_next+2>
> > e2 00 loop 0xffffffff81f8a2e9 <cpumask_next+9>
> > 55 push %rbp
> >
> > This shows first 2 "mov" instructions are copied to trampoline
> > buffer at 0xffffffffa000207a. Here is the disassembled result.
> > (skipped optprobe template instructions)
> >
> > Dump of assembler code from 0xffffffffa000207a to 0xffffffffa00020ea:
> > 54 push %rsp
> > ...
> > 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp
> > 9d popfq
> > 48 89 f0 mov %rsi,%rax
> > 8b 35 82 7d db e2 mov -0x1d24827e(%rip),%esi
> > # 0xffffffff82db9e67 <nr_cpu_ids+3>
> >
> > As it shows, the 2nd mov accesses *(nr_cpu_ids+3) instead of
> > *nr_cpu_ids. This leads a kernel freeze because cpumask_next()
> > always returns 0 and for_each_cpu() never ended.
> >
> > Fixing this by adding len correctly to real RIP address while
> > copying.
> >
> > Fixes: 63fef14fc98a ("kprobes/x86: Make insn buffer always ROX and use text_poke()")
> > Reported-by: Michael Rodin <michael@rodin.online>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
> > index eaf02f2e7300..e92672b8b490 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
> > @@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ static int copy_optimized_instructions(u8 *dest, u8 *src, u8 *real)
> > int len = 0, ret;
> >
> > while (len < RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE) {
> > - ret = __copy_instruction(dest + len, src + len, real, &insn);
> > + ret = __copy_instruction(dest + len, src + len, real + len,
> > + &insn);
>
> I applied this, except that I unbroke the line: please ignore checkpatch
> in such cases where the cure is worse than the disease ...
Thanks Ingo!
>
> I.e. even if slightly over 80 cols, this is more readable:
>
> ret = __copy_instruction(dest + len, src + len, real + len, &insn);
Got it.
BTW, this ugry "+ len" repeat would be avoided. I would better make a new inline
function to wrap it.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 17:16 Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-24 1:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-24 7:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-03 3:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-04 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-04 13:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-12-04 23:05 ` [tip:perf/urgent] kprobes/x86: Fix instruction patching corruption when copying more than one RIP-relative instruction tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181204224958.30d1080d4c4e795953e1588f@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@rodin.online \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome