From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A872C04EBF for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4199A20879 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:30:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544027449; bh=dHQfDerNuj2N49NiI3C9axw+52chXrULOjae4wogl1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=v8txTWVMSHw1RfAgNhpkjFPNk0Vvg2qfol9AIMzM0f0vZGXv2zEaUg6QX3x61t6S8 uVLEbbJFhl9pdh9o2jnr6xRpSFY8LGxVNemC9RsJBMEH+ej85H19n6R8bXOlBELqpy pZwaQr4UfR8fF8hxfAuH1SqBidEfJJ2RtCNegMMg= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4199A20879 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727859AbeLEQas (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:30:48 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42666 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727737AbeLEQar (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:30:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 484E62082B; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544027446; bh=dHQfDerNuj2N49NiI3C9axw+52chXrULOjae4wogl1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Os7JCdUIi7I/vQg1fUg0wshtF77uk+pcyYzqkvGHPRkWTpDx6aRB2urU30GrireD1 suuxBYKOP0ydlCJtcctmi5mboc/5zVAlOzjhgfaKgAtbKLAFLMuDQzhck7wTY7BDDv 47WLvZ5kr5RVhggiGLw0T51YXbVu1RmEJeTSDvnE= Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:30:44 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Peter Rajnoha Cc: rafael@kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, msekleta@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for synthetic uevents Message-ID: <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com> References: <20181205112745.12276-1-prajnoha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181205112745.12276-1-prajnoha@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Peter Rajnoha wrote: > Two small patches to aid handling of synthetic uevents back in userspace: > > - Return error code back to userspace on /sys/.../uevent file write > failure so userspace knows and it can act accordingly. > > - Add new 'kernel/uevent_features' sysfs file to make it possible for > userspace to check that the extended synthetic uevent arguments are > supported without relying on kernel version check only. > > Peter Rajnoha (2): > kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails > kobject: add kernel/uevent_features sysfs file Did you send this series twice? Which one should I pay attention to? confused, greg k-h