mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Spurious EIO on AIO+DIO+RWF_NOWAIT
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 06:48:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210124823.iw4mxmdqpsdfeap4@merlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bab0f40-5748-f147-efeb-5aac4fd44533@scylladb.com>

On 13:19 09/12, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I have an application that receives spurious EIO when running with
> RWF_NOWAIT enabled. Removing RWF_NOWAIT causes those EIOs to disappear. The
> application uses AIO+DIO, and errors were seen on both xfs and ext4.
> 
> 
> I suspect the following code:
> 
> 
> /*
>  * Process one completed BIO.  No locks are held.
>  */
> static blk_status_t dio_bio_complete(struct dio *dio, struct bio *bio)
> {
>         struct bio_vec *bvec;
>         unsigned i;
>         blk_status_t err = bio->bi_status;
> 
>         if (err) {
>                 if (err == BLK_STS_AGAIN && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
>                         dio->io_error = -EAGAIN;
>                 else
>                         dio->io_error = -EIO;
>         }
> 
> Could it be that REQ_NOWAIT was dropped from bio->bi_opf? or that
> bio->bi_status got changed along the way?
> 

I don't think REQ_NOWAIT is dropped. I am assuming bio->bi_status error
is set differently. Is the blk queue being stopped? Is it possible to
instrument the kernel in your testcase?

-- 
Goldwyn

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-09 11:19 Avi Kivity
2018-12-10 12:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2018-12-10 12:49   ` Avi Kivity
2018-12-12 12:05   ` Avi Kivity
2018-12-12 14:41     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181210124823.iw4mxmdqpsdfeap4@merlin \
    --to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®