From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D740C07E85 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E0D2081B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:06:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544537175; bh=qHuk0s9oZ1dUJnf671CHu6opZpsqOFphQEoMTEyG//A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=apKiNi1iVtkYR8OEiTYCu/uj3P3nkp8rqyFgtmg01HpTAzxxcUiVmwbpm5Tk/ut+a /D3mai9m2GuSYnt/AESVJMMj97fu8XIOwpXYNR2rfCzpkVpkB70KNKHVYJmIqW1RuE IMT6fZ5y4sIk5bR6QqV3ja8kbw7pmuQ2HmSQtUOg= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D8E0D2081B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726792AbeLKOGN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:06:13 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:44364 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726454AbeLKOGM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:06:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dcmFOvbLU2N9hJeL+no1ZLRM99AyO0uFTUlDrCU7RW8=; b=oeteazkgMvqzL17OWWbLHiW/H 4Py/CUg9HEvvQyrCtpUKmzsEB3bzGOxJMFjUPLERI/yB1fbCjhjPTnZcN2qKcjYHWxtrz2dMG4jMr KOk0E6rBT+wgpSJWCLAtBv0B1zRQwXaEWlUU8xC7oLqD+SBvHTDEojmUkkjgljUsTV2EY=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gWifp-00015r-W6; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:06:10 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84F25112540E; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:06:09 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:06:09 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Doug Anderson Cc: linux-arm-msm , Dmitry Osipenko , Evan Green , masneyb@onstation.org, Liam Girdwood , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Clean enabling always-on regulators + their supplies Message-ID: <20181211140609.GD6686@sirena.org.uk> References: <20181206222318.240401-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20181210154311.GF6307@sirena.org.uk> <20181211005221.GB3004@sirena.org.uk> <20181211010032.GE3004@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Immanuel doesn't pun, he Kant. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:40:53PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Can you confirm my patch applies cleanly to your for-next branch? I > can see that it doesn't apply to your 4.21 branch but I can't see it > fail on your for-next branch. No, I tried both and it didn't work on either. > The problem is that commit 2bb166636933 ("regulator: core: enable > power when setting up constraints") touches the same code but isn't in > the 4.21 branch. If you pick that to your 4.21 then my patch applies > cleanly. > If you'd prefer that I post my patch atop 4.21 I can do that tomorrow. I'd prefer that you resend like I said :( --4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlwPxFAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AOtwf/X8fdb0TdTEblIdfBN4DiYCcUwdgN2Vw+5q8yuetr3BSGqSbHsbJe/NQM x5cP8IwRfBe7A1gpJ+fBtFaFVGZfBgXa6T9mJvvOYOQeMhmR8ot7vjctL6nqPlRT hkW1hSwIVAn0drppgxW/5F8NJ+iNGFCd2yo628vUAWvUTm/ENytf8+sgl51N3+Fm d3djWoHNK1XuQuaMxqa/s/Y6A2Hjyx3Bvye3AQ++cXEGHWBqfExS/GDypTKjLw/+ Oh/PTsxKOVDpbYAbAjfPCyjuwC5w74v+1lTFPVRAEbvWq3arO7kEi+b59e21rJwQ mzq8Av+L8Wz75Df/3+GWANzHurUrqw== =LICg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu--