From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: "He, Bo" <bo.he@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"jiangshanlai@gmail.com" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Zhang, Jun" <jun.zhang@intel.com>,
"Xiao, Jin" <jin.xiao@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
"Bai, Jie A" <jie.a.bai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: rcu_preempt caused oom
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:24:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212022446.GV4170@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A18E53@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:37:40AM +0000, He, Bo wrote:
> We reproduced the issue panic in hung_task with the patch "Improve diagnostics for failed RCU grace-period start", but unfortunately maybe it's due to the loglevel, the show_rcu_gp_kthreads doesn't print any logs, we will improve the build and run the test to double check.
Well, at least the diagnostics didn't prevent the problem from happening. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 12:47 PM
> To: He, Bo <bo.he@intel.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; josh@joshtriplett.org; mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com; jiangshanlai@gmail.com; Zhang, Jun <jun.zhang@intel.com>; Xiao, Jin <jin.xiao@intel.com>; Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>; Bai, Jie A <jie.a.bai@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: rcu_preempt caused oom
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:38:38PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:56:18AM +0000, He, Bo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > We have start the test with the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, and also add one 2s to detect the preempt rcu hang, hope we can get more useful logs tomorrow.
> > > I also enclosed the config and the debug patches for you review.
> >
> > I instead suggest the (lightly tested) debug patch shown below, which
> > tracks wakeups of RCU's grace-period kthreads and dumps them out if a
> > given requested grace period fails to start. Again, it is necessary
> > to build with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, that is, with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y.
>
> Right. This time without commenting out the wakeup as a test of the diagnostic. :-/
>
> Please use the patch below instead of the one that I sent in my previous email.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit adfc7dff659495a3433d5084256be59eee0ac6df
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon Dec 10 16:33:59 2018 -0800
>
> rcu: Improve diagnostics for failed RCU grace-period start
>
> Backported from v4.21/v5.0
>
> If a grace period fails to start (for example, because you commented
> out the last two lines of rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked()), rcu_core()
> will invoke rcu_check_gp_start_stall(), which will notice and complain.
> However, this complaint is lacking crucial debugging information such
> as when the last wakeup executed and what the value of ->gp_seq was at
> that time. This commit therefore removes the current pr_alert() from
> rcu_check_gp_start_stall(), instead invoking show_rcu_gp_kthreads(),
> which has been updated to print the needed information, which is collected
> by rcu_gp_kthread_wake().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 0b760c1369f7..4bcd8753e293 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -626,25 +626,57 @@ void rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state);
>
> +/*
> + * Convert a ->gp_state value to a character string.
> + */
> +static const char *gp_state_getname(short gs) {
> + if (gs < 0 || gs >= ARRAY_SIZE(gp_state_names))
> + return "???";
> + return gp_state_names[gs];
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Return the root node of the specified rcu_state structure.
> + */
> +static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp) {
> + return &rsp->node[0];
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Show the state of the grace-period kthreads.
> */
> void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> + unsigned long j;
> + unsigned long ja;
> + unsigned long jr;
> + unsigned long jw;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> struct rcu_node *rnp;
> struct rcu_state *rsp;
>
> + j = jiffies;
> for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
> - pr_info("%s: wait state: %d ->state: %#lx\n",
> - rsp->name, rsp->gp_state, rsp->gp_kthread->state);
> + ja = j - READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity);
> + jr = j - READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_req_activity);
> + jw = j - READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_wake_time);
> + pr_info("%s: wait state: %s(%d) ->state: %#lx delta ->gp_activity %lu ->gp_req_activity %lu ->gp_wake_time %lu ->gp_wake_seq %ld ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->gp_flags %#x\n",
> + rsp->name, gp_state_getname(rsp->gp_state),
> + rsp->gp_state,
> + rsp->gp_kthread ? rsp->gp_kthread->state : 0x1ffffL,
> + ja, jr, jw, (long)READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_wake_seq),
> + (long)READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq),
> + (long)READ_ONCE(rcu_get_root(rsp)->gp_seq_needed),
> + READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags));
> rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
> if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rsp->gp_seq, rnp->gp_seq_needed))
> continue;
> - pr_info("\trcu_node %d:%d ->gp_seq %lu ->gp_seq_needed %lu\n",
> - rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, rnp->gp_seq,
> - rnp->gp_seq_needed);
> + pr_info("\trcu_node %d:%d ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld\n",
> + rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, (long)rnp->gp_seq,
> + (long)rnp->gp_seq_needed);
> if (!rcu_is_leaf_node(rnp))
> continue;
> for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) { @@ -653,8 +685,8 @@ void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void)
> ULONG_CMP_GE(rsp->gp_seq,
> rdp->gp_seq_needed))
> continue;
> - pr_info("\tcpu %d ->gp_seq_needed %lu\n",
> - cpu, rdp->gp_seq_needed);
> + pr_info("\tcpu %d ->gp_seq_needed %ld\n",
> + cpu, (long)rdp->gp_seq_needed);
> }
> }
> /* sched_show_task(rsp->gp_kthread); */ @@ -690,14 +722,6 @@ void rcutorture_get_gp_data(enum rcutorture_type test_type, int *flags, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcutorture_get_gp_data);
>
> -/*
> - * Return the root node of the specified rcu_state structure.
> - */
> -static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp) -{
> - return &rsp->node[0];
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Enter an RCU extended quiescent state, which can be either the
> * idle loop or adaptive-tickless usermode execution.
> @@ -1285,16 +1309,6 @@ static void record_gp_stall_check_time(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> rsp->n_force_qs_gpstart = READ_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs); }
>
> -/*
> - * Convert a ->gp_state value to a character string.
> - */
> -static const char *gp_state_getname(short gs) -{
> - if (gs < 0 || gs >= ARRAY_SIZE(gp_state_names))
> - return "???";
> - return gp_state_names[gs];
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Complain about starvation of grace-period kthread.
> */
> @@ -1693,7 +1707,8 @@ static bool rcu_future_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> * Don't do a self-awaken, and don't bother awakening when there is
> * nothing for the grace-period kthread to do (as in several CPUs
> * raced to awaken, and we lost), and finally don't try to awaken
> - * a kthread that has not yet been created.
> + * a kthread that has not yet been created. If all those checks are
> + * passed, track some debug information and awaken.
> */
> static void rcu_gp_kthread_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp) { @@ -1701,6 +1716,8 @@ static void rcu_gp_kthread_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> !READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) ||
> !rsp->gp_kthread)
> return;
> + WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_wake_time, jiffies);
> + WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_wake_seq, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq));
> swake_up_one(&rsp->gp_wq);
> }
>
> @@ -2802,16 +2819,11 @@ rcu_check_gp_start_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> return;
> }
> - pr_alert("%s: g%ld->%ld gar:%lu ga:%lu f%#x gs:%d %s->state:%#lx\n",
> - __func__, (long)READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq),
> - (long)READ_ONCE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed),
> - j - rsp->gp_req_activity, j - rsp->gp_activity,
> - rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_state, rsp->name,
> - rsp->gp_kthread ? rsp->gp_kthread->state : 0x1ffffL);
> WARN_ON(1);
> if (rnp_root != rnp)
> raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> + show_rcu_gp_kthreads();
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h index 4e74df768c57..0e051d9b5f1a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ struct rcu_state {
> struct swait_queue_head gp_wq; /* Where GP task waits. */
> short gp_flags; /* Commands for GP task. */
> short gp_state; /* GP kthread sleep state. */
> + unsigned long gp_wake_time; /* Last GP kthread wake. */
> + unsigned long gp_wake_seq; /* ->gp_seq at ^^^. */
>
> /* End of fields guarded by root rcu_node's lock. */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 8:49 He, Bo
2018-11-29 13:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-29 14:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-30 8:03 ` He, Bo
2018-11-30 14:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-30 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-30 15:18 ` He, Bo
2018-11-30 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-03 7:44 ` He, Bo
2018-12-03 13:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-04 7:50 ` He, Bo
2018-12-04 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-05 8:42 ` He, Bo
2018-12-05 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A16C46@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-06 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A180C5@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-07 14:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-09 19:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-10 6:56 ` He, Bo
2018-12-11 0:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-11 4:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-11 5:29 ` He, Bo
2018-12-12 1:37 ` He, Bo
2018-12-12 2:24 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
[not found] ` <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A192C3@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-12 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-12 21:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-12 23:13 ` He, Bo
2018-12-13 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-13 2:11 ` Zhang, Jun
2018-12-13 2:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <88DC34334CA3444C85D647DBFA962C2735AD5F9E@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-13 4:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A197EC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-13 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-14 1:30 ` He, Bo
2018-12-14 2:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-14 2:40 ` He, Bo
2018-12-14 5:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-14 5:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-17 3:15 ` He, Bo
2018-12-17 4:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CD6925E8781EFD4D8E11882D20FC406D52A1A634@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-18 2:46 ` Zhang, Jun
2018-12-18 3:12 ` He, Bo
2018-12-18 5:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-13 8:31 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Prevent needless ->gp_seq_needed update in __note_gp_changes() tip-bot for Zhang, Jun
2019-02-13 8:30 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Do RCU GP kthread self-wakeup from softirq and interrupt tip-bot for Zhang, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212022446.GV4170@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bo.he@intel.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jie.a.bai@intel.com \
--cc=jin.xiao@intel.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jun.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome