From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A700C67839 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490B820851 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:54:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 490B820851 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726962AbeLMCx7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:53:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49620 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726921AbeLMCx4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:53:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C2C3082AFD; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jason-ThinkPad-T450s.redhat.com (ovpn-12-167.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.167]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BEB5D70A; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:53:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Jason Wang To: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tonghao Zhang Subject: [PATCH net V3 3/3] Revert "net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one" Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:53:39 +0800 Message-Id: <20181213025339.14023-4-jasowang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181213025339.14023-1-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <20181213025339.14023-1-jasowang@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This reverts commit 78139c94dc8c96a478e67dab3bee84dc6eccb5fd. We don't protect device IOTLB with vq mutex, which will lead e.g use after free for device IOTLB entries. And since we've switched to use mutex_trylock() in previous patch, it's safe to revert it without having deadlock. Fixes: commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") Cc: Tonghao Zhang Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: Jason Wang --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 5915f240275a..55e5aa662ad5 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -295,11 +295,8 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct vhost_dev *d) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) { - mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex); + for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) __vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]); - mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex); - } } static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev, @@ -895,6 +892,20 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, #define vhost_get_used(vq, x, ptr) \ vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, VHOST_ADDR_USED) +static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d) +{ + int i = 0; + for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) + mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i); +} + +static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d) +{ + int i = 0; + for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) + mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex); +} + static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem, u64 start, u64 size, u64 end, u64 userspace_addr, int perm) @@ -976,6 +987,7 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&dev->mutex); + vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev); switch (msg->type) { case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE: if (!dev->iotlb) { @@ -1009,6 +1021,7 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, break; } + vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(dev); mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex); return ret; -- 2.17.1