From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: pizza@shaftnet.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cw1200: Fix concurrency use-after-free bugs in cw1200_hw_scan()
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:55:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214035521.30388-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> (raw)
The function cw1200_bss_info_changed() and cw1200_hw_scan() can be
concurrently executed.
The two functions both access a possible shared variable "frame.skb".
This shared variable is freed by dev_kfree_skb() in cw1200_upload_beacon(),
which is called by cw1200_bss_info_changed(). The free operation is
protected by a mutex lock "priv->conf_mutex" in cw1200_bss_info_changed().
In cw1200_hw_scan(), this shared variable is accessed without the
protection of the mutex lock "priv->conf_mutex".
Thus, concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.
To fix these bugs, the original calls to mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex) and
mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex) are moved to the places, which can
protect the accesses to the shared variable.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
index 67213f11acbd..0a9eac93dd01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
if (req->n_ssids > WSM_SCAN_MAX_NUM_OF_SSIDS)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
+ down(&priv->scan.lock);
+ mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
+
frame.skb = ieee80211_probereq_get(hw, priv->vif->addr, NULL, 0,
req->ie_len);
if (!frame.skb)
@@ -86,19 +90,15 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
if (req->ie_len)
skb_put_data(frame.skb, req->ie, req->ie_len);
- /* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
- down(&priv->scan.lock);
- mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-
ret = wsm_set_template_frame(priv, &frame);
if (!ret) {
/* Host want to be the probe responder. */
ret = wsm_set_probe_responder(priv, true);
}
if (ret) {
+ dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
up(&priv->scan.lock);
- dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
return ret;
}
@@ -120,10 +120,9 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
++priv->scan.n_ssids;
}
- mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-
if (frame.skb)
dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan.work);
return 0;
}
--
2.17.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-14 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 3:55 Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
2018-12-20 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181214035521.30388-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pizza@shaftnet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®