From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3AEC43387 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C9A2084D for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731812AbeLQJRu (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:17:50 -0500 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:54462 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726788AbeLQJRu (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:17:50 -0500 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 214BE3F4; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:17:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:17:47 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Will Deacon Cc: Vivek Gautam , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding doc for Qcom smmu-500 Message-ID: <20181217091747.dgo65nejzviadklv@8bytes.org> References: <20181213090507.6269-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> <20181213104524.GA31177@edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181213104524.GA31177@edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:45:24AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Joerg -- please can you take this on top of the pull request I sent already? > Vivek included it as part of a separate series which I thought was going > via arm-soc, but actually it needs to go with the other arm-smmu patches > in order to avoid conflicts. Applied, thanks.