From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
johannes.berg@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/15] locking/lockdep: Introduce lockdep_next_lockchain() and lock_chain_count()
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:29:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217213002.73776-10-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217213002.73776-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
This patch does not change any functionality but makes the next patch in
this series easier to read.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 3 ++-
kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 12 ++++++------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 287dc022d27a..a71ca42978c2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
return 0;
}
-unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
+static unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
int nr_chain_hlocks;
static u16 chain_hlocks[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS];
@@ -2231,6 +2231,20 @@ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr,
return 1;
}
+/*
+ * Given an index that is >= -1, return the index of the next lock chain.
+ * Return -2 if there is no next lock chain.
+ */
+long lockdep_next_lockchain(long i)
+{
+ return i + 1 < nr_lock_chains ? i + 1 : -2;
+}
+
+unsigned long lock_chain_count(void)
+{
+ return nr_lock_chains;
+}
+
/*
* Adds a dependency chain into chain hashtable. And must be called with
* graph_lock held.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
index 88c847a41c8a..ba8a4ac7bd04 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i);
extern unsigned long nr_lock_classes;
extern unsigned long nr_list_entries;
-extern unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
+long lockdep_next_lockchain(long i);
+unsigned long lock_chain_count(void);
extern int nr_chain_hlocks;
extern unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 3d31f9b0059e..9c49ec645d8b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -104,18 +104,18 @@ static const struct seq_operations lockdep_ops = {
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
static void *lc_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
+ if (*pos < 0)
+ return NULL;
+
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
- if (*pos - 1 < nr_lock_chains)
- return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
-
- return NULL;
+ return lock_chains + (*pos - 1);
}
static void *lc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
- (*pos)++;
+ *pos = lockdep_next_lockchain(*pos - 1) + 1;
return lc_start(m, pos);
}
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
seq_printf(m, " dependency chains: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
- nr_lock_chains, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
+ lock_chain_count(), MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS);
seq_printf(m, " dependency chain hlocks: %11d [max: %lu]\n",
nr_chain_hlocks, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS);
#endif
--
2.20.0.405.gbc1bbc6f85-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 21:29 [PATCH v5 00/15] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] locking/lockdep: Fix required memory size reported if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=n Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entries Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] locking/lockdep: Reorder struct lock_class members Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] locking/lockdep: Initialize the locks_before and locks_after lists earlier Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] locking/lockdep: Split lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftest Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-01-10 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 18:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-10 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 21:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-11 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-13 0:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-10 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 19:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-10 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] locking/lockdep: Reuse list entries " Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] locking/lockdep: Reuse lock chains that have been freed Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency Bart Van Assche
2019-01-10 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] locking/lockdep: Verify whether lock objects are small enough to be used as class keys Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:30 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:30 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues Bart Van Assche
2018-12-17 21:30 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] lockdep tests: Test dynamic key registration Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181217213002.73776-10-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome