From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857AC43387 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70302133F for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbeLRImg (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:42:36 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45546 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726346AbeLRImg (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:42:36 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DC9AFC5; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:42:34 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree Message-ID: <20181218084234.sa2gplversistjzf@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20181218070807.07cb795d@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181218070807.07cb795d@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2018-12-18 07:08:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Commit > > 503283fa006d ("printk: Add caller information to printk() output.") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > > Moreover, that patch appears twice in the tree (the other time properly > signed-off), Thanks a lot for the report. I have fixed it. Sigh, I guess that I left there the duplicated patch from testing. It is pity that git did not complain. I need to be more careful. Best Regards, Petr