From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
seanpaul@chromium.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
tomas.winkler@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/39] component: alloc component_match without any comp to match
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:42:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181219134245.GB21184@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544673701-6353-5-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:31:06AM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> If all the components associated to a component master is not added
> to the component framework due to the HW capability or Kconfig
> selection, component_match will be NULL at
> component_master_add_with_match().
>
> To avoid this, component_match_alloc() is added to the framework,
> to allcoate the struct component_match with zero associated components.
> Hence component master can be added with a component_match with zero
> associated components.
>
> This helps the component master bind call to get triggered,
> even if no component is registered for that particular master.
>
> This is meant for big PCI device drivers where small/optional
> features are external components, and based on usecases different
> combination of components are build as entire driver.
>
> In such PCI device driver Load, if we use the component master for
> waiting for few components(features) availability, only if they are
> supported by the underlying HW, then we need to allocate memory for
> component_match using the API introduced in this change before
> the call to component_master_add_with_match.
>
> v2:
> No Change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Greg, I expect the i915 feature that needs this will only land in 4.22.
I'm also not aware of anyone else using this (all the other component
users always use components). How do you want to get this landed?
I think either getting this into 4.21, or an ack for merging through drm
trees would work well for us.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/base/component.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/component.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
> index e8d676fad0c9..0ab36b2255ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/component.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
> @@ -312,6 +312,36 @@ static int component_match_realloc(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> /*
> + * Allocate the match without any component_match_array elements.
> + *
> + * This function is useful when the component master might end up
> + * registering itself without any matching components.
> + */
> +void component_match_alloc(struct device *master,
> + struct component_match **matchptr)
> +{
> + struct component_match *match = *matchptr;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(match))
> + return;
> +
> + if (match)
> + return;
> +
> + match = devres_alloc(devm_component_match_release,
> + sizeof(*match), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!match) {
> + *matchptr = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + devres_add(master, match);
> +
> + *matchptr = match;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(component_match_alloc);
> +
> +/*
> * Add a component to be matched, with a release function.
> *
> * The match array is first created or extended if necessary.
> diff --git a/include/linux/component.h b/include/linux/component.h
> index e71fbbbc74e2..3f6b420a58f8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/component.h
> +++ b/include/linux/component.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ void component_match_add_release(struct device *master,
> struct component_match **matchptr,
> void (*release)(struct device *, void *),
> int (*compare)(struct device *, void *), void *compare_data);
> +void component_match_alloc(struct device *master,
> + struct component_match **matchptr);
>
> static inline void component_match_add(struct device *master,
> struct component_match **matchptr,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-19 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1544673701-6353-1-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
2018-12-13 4:01 ` Ramalingam C
2018-12-19 13:42 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-12-19 15:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] <1544650998-31192-1-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
2018-12-12 21:42 ` Ramalingam C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181219134245.GB21184@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®