From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jroedel@suse.de, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:34:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181219143451.GY16835@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30d86186-e0a2-2be1-2295-20510fbd74ba@samsung.com>
Hi Marek,
thanks for the report!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
> > function of the IOMMU-API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > index c5dd63072529..4d4847de727e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > @@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> > ops = dev->iommu_fwspec->ops;
> > /*
> > * If we have reason to believe the IOMMU driver missed the initial
> > - * add_device callback for dev, replay it to get things in order.
> > + * probe for dev, replay it to get things in order.
> > */
> > - if (ops && ops->add_device && dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group)
> > - err = ops->add_device(dev);
> > + if (dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group)
> > + err = iommu_probe_device(dev);
>
> This change removes a check for NULL ops, what causes NULL pointer
> exception on first device without IOMMU.
Bummer, this check was supposed to be in iommu_probe_device(), but
apparently it got lost. Does the attached patch fix it?
> I'm also not sure if this is a good idea to call iommu_probe_device(),
> which comes from dev->bus->iommu_ops, which might be different from ops
> from local variable.
The local variable comes from dev->iommu_fwspec->ops, which should be
exactly the same as dev->bus->iommu_ops. I'll leave that for now until
it turns out to be a problem (which I don't expect).
Regards,
Joerg
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index a2131751dcff..3ed4db334341 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
{
const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
WARN_ON(dev->iommu_group);
- return ops->add_device(dev);
+ if (ops)
+ ret = ops->add_device(dev);
+
+ return ret;
}
void iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-19 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 15:05 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Consolidate iommu_ops->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu/sysfs: Rename iommu_release_device() Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu: Consolitate ->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly Joerg Roedel
2018-12-19 9:54 ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-12-19 14:34 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2018-12-19 14:53 ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-12-20 9:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-12-20 15:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-01-11 10:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI/IORT: " Joerg Roedel
2018-12-17 9:40 ` Hanjun Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-05 14:36 [PATCH 0/4] Consolitate iommu_ops->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly Joerg Roedel
2018-12-05 18:49 ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-06 16:19 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181219143451.GY16835@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome