mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jroedel@suse.de, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:34:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181219143451.GY16835@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30d86186-e0a2-2be1-2295-20510fbd74ba@samsung.com>

Hi Marek,

thanks for the report!

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
> > function of the IOMMU-API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > index c5dd63072529..4d4847de727e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > @@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> >  		ops = dev->iommu_fwspec->ops;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If we have reason to believe the IOMMU driver missed the initial
> > -	 * add_device callback for dev, replay it to get things in order.
> > +	 * probe for dev, replay it to get things in order.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (ops && ops->add_device && dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group)
> > -		err = ops->add_device(dev);
> > +	if (dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group)
> > +		err = iommu_probe_device(dev);
> 
> This change removes a check for NULL ops, what causes NULL pointer
> exception on first device without IOMMU.

Bummer, this check was supposed to be in iommu_probe_device(), but
apparently it got lost. Does the attached patch fix it?

> I'm also not sure if this is a good idea to call iommu_probe_device(),
> which comes from dev->bus->iommu_ops, which might be different from ops
> from local variable.

The local variable comes from dev->iommu_fwspec->ops, which should be
exactly the same as dev->bus->iommu_ops. I'll leave that for now until
it turns out to be a problem (which I don't expect).


Regards,

	Joerg

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index a2131751dcff..3ed4db334341 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
 int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
 {
 	const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	WARN_ON(dev->iommu_group);
 
-	return ops->add_device(dev);
+	if (ops)
+		ret = ops->add_device(dev);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-19 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11 15:05 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Consolidate iommu_ops->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu/sysfs: Rename iommu_release_device() Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu: Consolitate ->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly Joerg Roedel
2018-12-19  9:54   ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-12-19 14:34     ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2018-12-19 14:53       ` Marek Szyprowski
2018-12-20  9:13         ` Joerg Roedel
2018-12-20 15:42       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-01-11 10:23         ` Joerg Roedel
2018-12-11 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI/IORT: " Joerg Roedel
2018-12-17  9:40   ` Hanjun Guo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-05 14:36 [PATCH 0/4] Consolitate iommu_ops->add/remove_device() calls Joerg Roedel
2018-12-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/of: Don't call iommu_ops->add_device directly Joerg Roedel
2018-12-05 18:49   ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-06 16:19     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181219143451.GY16835@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome