mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: introduce a function to find the first physical device
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:20:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2019009.4Y5n3ZF6bK@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453300171-25473-2-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>

On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 08:29:26 PM Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> Factor out the code that finds the first physical device
> of a given ACPI device.  It is used in several places.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

I guess the above doesn't apply any more, does it?

> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 19 ++-----------------
>  drivers/acpi/bus.c           | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h      |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index 296b7a1..c3af108 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
>  struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = NULL;
> -	struct acpi_device *acpi_parent;
>  	struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
>  	struct resource_entry *rentry;
>  	struct list_head resource_list;
> @@ -82,22 +81,8 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  	 * attached to it, that physical device should be the parent of the
>  	 * platform device we are about to create.
>  	 */
> -	pdevinfo.parent = NULL;
> -	acpi_parent = adev->parent;
> -	if (acpi_parent) {
> -		struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
> -		struct list_head *list;
> -
> -		mutex_lock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
> -		list = &acpi_parent->physical_node_list;
> -		if (!list_empty(list)) {
> -			entry = list_first_entry(list,
> -					struct acpi_device_physical_node,
> -					node);
> -			pdevinfo.parent = entry->dev;
> -		}
> -		mutex_unlock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
> -	}
> +	pdevinfo.parent = adev->parent ?
> +		acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev->parent) : NULL;
>  	pdevinfo.name = dev_name(&adev->dev);
>  	pdevinfo.id = -1;
>  	pdevinfo.res = resources;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index a212cef..832b26d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -478,24 +478,35 @@ static void acpi_device_remove_notify_handler(struct acpi_device *device)
>                               Device Matching
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>  
> -static struct acpi_device *acpi_primary_dev_companion(struct acpi_device *adev,
> -						      const struct device *dev)
> +/**
> + * acpi_device_fix_parent - Get first physical node of an ACPI device

Please fix the function name here.

> + * @adev: ACPI device in question
> + */
> +struct device *acpi_get_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  {
>  	struct mutex *physical_node_lock = &adev->physical_node_lock;
> +	struct device *node = NULL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(physical_node_lock);
> -	if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> -		adev = NULL;
> -	} else {
> -		const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
>  
> +	if (!list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list))
>  		node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> -					struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> -		if (node->dev != dev)
> -			adev = NULL;
> -	}
> +				struct acpi_device_physical_node, node)->dev;
> +

No, you don't have to change all that code.

Exercise: rework this function with as few lines of code changed as you possibly can.

>  	mutex_unlock(physical_node_lock);
> -	return adev;
> +
> +	return node;
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_device *acpi_primary_dev_companion(struct acpi_device *adev,
> +						      const struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct device *node = acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev);

s/node/phys_dev/ ?

> +
> +	if (node && node == dev)
> +		return adev;
> +
> +	return NULL;

return phys_dev && phys_dev == dev ? adev : NULL;

One line of code instead of 4.

>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 11d87bf..ee9312ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ bool acpi_device_is_present(struct acpi_device *adev);
>  bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
>  bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  					const struct device *dev);
> +struct device *acpi_get_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev);
>  
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                       Device Matching and Notification
> 

Thanks,
Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 14:29 [PATCH v6 0/2] Add AMBA bus probing support to ACPI Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 14:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: introduce a function to find the first physical device Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 15:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-01-20 17:00     ` Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 17:25       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-02-16  1:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-16  1:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-16 12:52     ` Aleksey Makarov
2016-02-16 19:20       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-20 14:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ACPI: amba bus probing support Aleksey Makarov
2016-02-16  1:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2019009.4Y5n3ZF6bK@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=aleksey.makarov@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®