From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: introduce a function to find the first physical device
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:20:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2019009.4Y5n3ZF6bK@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453300171-25473-2-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 08:29:26 PM Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> Factor out the code that finds the first physical device
> of a given ACPI device. It is used in several places.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
I guess the above doesn't apply any more, does it?
> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 19 ++-----------------
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index 296b7a1..c3af108 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
> struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = NULL;
> - struct acpi_device *acpi_parent;
> struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> struct resource_entry *rentry;
> struct list_head resource_list;
> @@ -82,22 +81,8 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
> * attached to it, that physical device should be the parent of the
> * platform device we are about to create.
> */
> - pdevinfo.parent = NULL;
> - acpi_parent = adev->parent;
> - if (acpi_parent) {
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
> - struct list_head *list;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
> - list = &acpi_parent->physical_node_list;
> - if (!list_empty(list)) {
> - entry = list_first_entry(list,
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node,
> - node);
> - pdevinfo.parent = entry->dev;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&acpi_parent->physical_node_lock);
> - }
> + pdevinfo.parent = adev->parent ?
> + acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev->parent) : NULL;
> pdevinfo.name = dev_name(&adev->dev);
> pdevinfo.id = -1;
> pdevinfo.res = resources;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index a212cef..832b26d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -478,24 +478,35 @@ static void acpi_device_remove_notify_handler(struct acpi_device *device)
> Device Matching
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>
> -static struct acpi_device *acpi_primary_dev_companion(struct acpi_device *adev,
> - const struct device *dev)
> +/**
> + * acpi_device_fix_parent - Get first physical node of an ACPI device
Please fix the function name here.
> + * @adev: ACPI device in question
> + */
> +struct device *acpi_get_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev)
> {
> struct mutex *physical_node_lock = &adev->physical_node_lock;
> + struct device *node = NULL;
>
> mutex_lock(physical_node_lock);
> - if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> - adev = NULL;
> - } else {
> - const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
>
> + if (!list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list))
> node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> - if (node->dev != dev)
> - adev = NULL;
> - }
> + struct acpi_device_physical_node, node)->dev;
> +
No, you don't have to change all that code.
Exercise: rework this function with as few lines of code changed as you possibly can.
> mutex_unlock(physical_node_lock);
> - return adev;
> +
> + return node;
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_device *acpi_primary_dev_companion(struct acpi_device *adev,
> + const struct device *dev)
> +{
> + const struct device *node = acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev);
s/node/phys_dev/ ?
> +
> + if (node && node == dev)
> + return adev;
> +
> + return NULL;
return phys_dev && phys_dev == dev ? adev : NULL;
One line of code instead of 4.
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 11d87bf..ee9312ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ bool acpi_device_is_present(struct acpi_device *adev);
> bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
> bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
> const struct device *dev);
> +struct device *acpi_get_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev);
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Device Matching and Notification
>
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 14:29 [PATCH v6 0/2] Add AMBA bus probing support to ACPI Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 14:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: introduce a function to find the first physical device Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-01-20 17:00 ` Aleksey Makarov
2016-01-20 17:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-02-16 1:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-16 1:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-16 12:52 ` Aleksey Makarov
2016-02-16 19:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-20 14:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ACPI: amba bus probing support Aleksey Makarov
2016-02-16 1:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2019009.4Y5n3ZF6bK@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=aleksey.makarov@linaro.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®