From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C27C43387 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9721479 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:34:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1546518877; bh=lE30DEBsMyqVtarIPnTyAKXgsFlVsolmUcj4aZ5R7j8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=SOcYtMj0bXVHaE3QMUQa/mAUX4ebl8KpkqsbnbtB+FofRjDwzVQALZEFqHxe4lDVr xrTscDyx2tUw7dMcBLcuxqv6llVPYO47nKPECdRwF8H9pEbRf3HJ1kG/JSx2sFPN4m PyWZUCffTgv4wqACnCcciPgwA1pj/haeu7d+OIOI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730921AbfACMeg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:34:36 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:59382 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726259AbfACMeg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:34:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=yqzuYoTiGAUHUr3Dw9FR7Ct/Ol1rX/VorE7ZjjtN4tc=; b=HIvUNCcNnAVe90vxvA+WpuNn8 tV4yH4Bza1FL4zlcfhI19a3geKutd7KUgghe5tKWnBfxVvwAX/ZKJ1D1ef7v3DxxqRBHBuHyyF89S UygtJ1jbc4+ABTfHCkloVdk4yYWg0usgk+1/WhhmkUZoIWkNHn2Qbe43CoU6jU6QTuwCk=; Received: from [2001:470:1f1d:6b5:7e7a:91ff:fede:4a45] (helo=finisterre.ee.mobilebroadband) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf2C9-0005T3-VJ; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 12:33:54 +0000 Received: by finisterre.ee.mobilebroadband (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31559440080; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:33:52 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Sinan Kaya Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , Jie Yang , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit Message-ID: <20190103123352.GQ1846@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190102181038.4418-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20190102181038.4418-9-okaya@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GJ7e10BhKqIkML+d" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190102181038.4418-9-okaya@kernel.org> X-Cookie: knowledge, n.: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GJ7e10BhKqIkML+d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:10:35PM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote: > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were > satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be > specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends > on PCI. For this reason, add a direct dependency on CONFIG_PCI to the > IOSF_MBI driver. I still don't understand what's going on with dependencies here and still don't have the cover letter or anything :( . As far as I can tell the above commit is in Linus' tree so I'd expect I can just apply it directly but you were saying that this needs to go via some other tree so I'm a bit confused as to what's going on here. --GJ7e10BhKqIkML+d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlwuAS8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AfsAf/Y8iYvN5bwrUXaCdE6npcj44ip+VII6wzCtj/kkF12jE3fs038wm47Wy6 PMwMLgsThOPQ+xnpqR3kKGLVj3NPMXNPEQc88AKH628xL4CnQIlMDkZuTz3kQGBx PWC3hm3SpPhqnJ4CMcAFMlkUr8pstJgYfYMrYU2lMKP6lcQnehULZH3CqNrVLCAP RnDtVVM+7aG9Q9uSDCDHwyDHW6MGJSbu1Y1qneYBlAzDtRZLv70OPcKBUhOFp2Td fV0+F8eu01xcu0OWEPsd6woapz5gWRrWjED4sZ//ORXC4z0S7C8AtquuVstD1pdq XmOUm5jv+LM/UqCLQR9jFNkXD8XeyQ== =2d4x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GJ7e10BhKqIkML+d--