From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35681C43387 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 21:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EBB218D3 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 21:41:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1546638119; bh=LztnY2qaiDP88JkN1oCLUEPd1IqtY9sxD3nse74VJ2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=1GdGknpX5TY3VUEBsq187/q/bj6loGQ17Q0adCVZHNQWhV1PALNznmc/B/64fsbK0 8U65WLyLnoYqBoeweL/gAVT+Edt93UYdaCjRSdq9iXcWopnii4ZHYgnPZ5JUZKNUAw sZb1qh8e5+Xm9riL9HiP6F/+gWhndf2O2Xmw2aBY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726453AbfADVl6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 16:41:58 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:37270 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726168AbfADVl5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 16:41:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bUFIOpkaPhj/lM0IunD6gd2bp13FnGJa9twvsCIq78Q=; b=D0CQLG6+tWW95WKpZIQMFYhpv I5vg6LtePfMo28u9cexa6LpFbxE4C1ryCisUd8kgSOwb893spaBA2hf75gnD6hhdyMzDQkrfWkbLf xk55stnqNIb9Av93R0D10aDEdA1fPwfhnQUtlS2SSDNqBzUsT2dIZ/56+1Iq/aEf+5xMo=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=finisterre.ee.mobilebroadband) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gfXDr-0002tE-B0; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 21:41:43 +0000 Received: by finisterre.ee.mobilebroadband (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58661440082; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 21:41:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 21:41:42 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Ross Zwisler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dylan Reid , Bard Liao , Jaroslav Kysela , Liam Girdwood , Oder Chiou , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Hsinyu Chao Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5677: use more of the volume range from DACs Message-ID: <20190104214142.GA2410@sirena.org.uk> References: <20181220232555.90030-1-zwisler@google.com> <20190104205132.GA106594@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190104205132.GA106594@google.com> X-Cookie: Dyslexics have more fnu. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Ping on this patch. Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlwv0xMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Ciigf/agQi1BddVaEe/9avDU1HhJQEyE77MZ4jJF8YbD8qrWrX/f5ehl2n/XrM HSrs2jxL1nqtS9h33HkfOZBoUJM6IN+MT+rhEWvircmI+iRtBcKVSWA1DhDbgpG2 Rru4FReoN1B7cilVvI6YJoeT+Ey28wu9z6/eG43tLUwh3zlYEGQWMYaaC1anfB6o VTOeXSwNLoFQMbpNNXlDfJK5eKqPZV6M1lr4Gj/uSyWwdozfWZnk5EYLiETinCKr wzTcyFrZKTP+BkZ99037bIc6mtqBL+ljVDZPV7ROICuU6lc0YnsYgns1dWHmElGS e++y8JRkhaQ2oCd/MT0FYO0ephhLVg== =aebp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--