From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A4DC43387 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 22:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3407F218AE for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 22:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727142AbfAGW4S (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:56:18 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60180 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726742AbfAGW4Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:56:16 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-170-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.170.16]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7865CA67; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 22:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:56:14 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Olof Johansson , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Huang Shijie , Alexey Skidanov Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/genalloc.c: include vmalloc.h Message-Id: <20190107145614.2152eb5e59248d17994759ea@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20190105212118.61022-1-olof@lixom.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 13:35:33 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:21 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > Fixes build break on most ARM/ARM64 defconfigs: > > Interesting. > > Andrew, I thought ARM was one of the platforms that your tree compiled > against? Or was some other change just hiding this? > I've become a bit lazy with the cross-compiling because linux-next's build coverage is pretty broad. But Stephen's holiday interrupted things and this one fell in that window.