From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1FEC43387 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2D420685 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726891AbfAIVho (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:37:44 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38186 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726090AbfAIVho (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:37:44 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x09LScpe145079 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:37:42 -0500 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pwru0rhbj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:37:42 -0500 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:41 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:38 -0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x09Lbbvm16515294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:37 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F859B206C; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4D2B2067; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.88]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6C9A16C63E5; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:37:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, Junchang Wang , "Paul E . McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] doc: Fix outdated links Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:37:35 -0800 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190109213302.GA1723@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190109213302.GA1723@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010921-2213-0000-0000-0000033996C2 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010375; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000274; SDB=6.01144148; UDB=6.00595710; IPR=6.00924410; MB=3.00025056; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-09 21:37:41 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010921-2214-0000-0000-00005CE7FADE Message-Id: <20190109213735.3405-3-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-09_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=900 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901090171 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Junchang Wang Fix outdated links in whatisRCU.txt. Signed-off-by: Junchang Wang Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt index 4a6854318b17..1ace20815bb1 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ rcu_dereference() must prohibit. The rcu_dereference_protected() variant takes a lockdep expression to indicate which locks must be acquired by the caller. If the indicated protection is not provided, - a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements.html + a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html and the API's code comments for more details and example usage. The following diagram shows how each API communicates among the @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ presents two such "toy" implementations of RCU, one that is implemented in terms of familiar locking primitives, and another that more closely resembles "classic" RCU. Both are way too simple for real-world use, lacking both functionality and performance. However, they are useful -in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcupdate.c for a +in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcu/update.c for a production-quality implementation, and see: http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU -- 2.17.1