From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] torture: Explain and simplify odd "for" loop in mkinitrd.sh
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:50:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109215008.6401-2-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109214944.GA5610@linux.ibm.com>
Why a Bourne-shell "for" loop? And why 192 instances of "a"? This commit
adds a shell comment to present the answer to these mysteries. It also
uses a series of factor-of-four Bourne-shell assignments to make it
easy to see how many instances there are, replacing the earlier wall of
'a' characters.
Reported-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
[ paulmck: Fix wrong-variable bugs noted by Andrea Parri. ]
---
.../selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh | 23 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh
index da298394daa2..e79eb35c41e2 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/mkinitrd.sh
@@ -40,17 +40,24 @@ mkdir $T
cat > $T/init << '__EOF___'
#!/bin/sh
# Run in userspace a few milliseconds every second. This helps to
-# exercise the NO_HZ_FULL portions of RCU.
+# exercise the NO_HZ_FULL portions of RCU. The 192 instances of "a" was
+# empirically shown to give a nice multi-millisecond burst of user-mode
+# execution on a 2GHz CPU, as desired. Modern CPUs will vary from a
+# couple of milliseconds up to perhaps 100 milliseconds, which is an
+# acceptable range.
+#
+# Why not calibrate an exact delay? Because within this initrd, we
+# are restricted to Bourne-shell builtins, which as far as I know do not
+# provide any means of obtaining a fine-grained timestamp.
+
+a4="a a a a"
+a16="$a4 $a4 $a4 $a4"
+a64="$a16 $a16 $a16 $a16"
+a192="$a64 $a64 $a64"
while :
do
q=
- for i in \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a \
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
+ for i in $a192
do
q="$q $i"
done
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:49 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Torture-test updates for v5.1 Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcutorture: Record grace periods in forward-progress histogram Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcutorture: Add grace period after CPU offline Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcuperf: Stop abusing IS_ENABLED() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcutorture/nolibc: Fix the clobbered registers in the MIPS syscall definition Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcutorture/nolibc: Fix some poor indentation and alignment Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcutorture/nolibc: Add a bit of documentation to explain how to use nolibc Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] tools headers: Move the nolibc header from rcutorture to tools/include/nolibc/ Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the maintainer for the nolibc header file(s) Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] RCU/torture.txt: Remove section MODULE PARAMETERS Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109215008.6401-2-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome