From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E613C43387 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785B620859 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726856AbfAIX4C (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:56:02 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:53378 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726729AbfAIXz5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:55:57 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71001165C; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:55:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from beelzebub.austin.arm.com (beelzebub.austin.arm.com [10.118.12.119]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C9AAA3F5AF; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:55:56 -0800 (PST) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, dave.martin@arm.com, shankerd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ykaukab@suse.de, julien.thierry@arm.com, mlangsdo@redhat.com, steven.price@arm.com, stefan.wahren@i2se.com, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for speculative store bypass Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:55:43 -0600 Message-Id: <20190109235544.2992426-7-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 In-Reply-To: <20190109235544.2992426-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20190109235544.2992426-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return status based on ssbd_state and the arm64 SSBS feature. If the mitigation is disabled, or the firmware isn't responding then return the expected machine state based on a new blacklist of known vulnerable cores. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index ee286d606d9b..c8ff96158b94 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ enable_smccc_arch_workaround_1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry) DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required); int ssbd_state __read_mostly = ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL; +static bool __ssb_safe = true; static const struct ssbd_options { const char *str; @@ -385,10 +386,18 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, { struct arm_smccc_res res; bool required = true; + bool is_vul; s32 val; WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible()); + is_vul = is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), entry->midr_range_list); + + if (is_vul) + __ssb_safe = false; + + arm64_requested_vuln_attrs |= VULN_SSB; + if (this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) { required = false; goto out_printmsg; @@ -422,6 +431,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN; return false; + /* machines with mixed mitigation requirements must not return this */ case SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED: pr_info_once("%s mitigation not required\n", entry->desc); ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED; @@ -476,6 +486,17 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, return required; } + +/* known vulnerable cores */ +static const struct midr_range arm64_ssb_cpus[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A57), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A72), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A73), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A75), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A76), + {}, +}; + #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD */ static void __maybe_unused @@ -762,6 +783,7 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { .capability = ARM64_SSBD, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, .matches = has_ssbd_mitigation, + .midr_range_list = arm64_ssb_cpus, }, #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 @@ -809,4 +831,30 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); } +ssize_t cpu_show_spec_store_bypass(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + /* + * Two assumptions: First, get_ssbd_state() reflects the worse case + * for hetrogenous machines, and that if SSBS is supported its + * supported by all cores. + */ + switch (arm64_get_ssbd_state()) { + case ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED: + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + case ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL: + case ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE: + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + return sprintf(buf, + "Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled\n"); + } + + if (__ssb_safe) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); +} + #endif -- 2.17.2