From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=uvhX=PT=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F56BC43387
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB3821841
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726431AbfAKVzj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:55:39 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52392 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725536AbfAKVzj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:55:39 -0500
Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 989712183F;
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:55:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:55:35 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc:     Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls
Message-ID: <20190111165535.467c59a3@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20190111214122.dzye2mg32aksuyo3@treble>
References: <CALCETrWBwTVHWXahVXMMBL4QA1f+YdKgv1XANXPsk86FjFFH2Q@mail.gmail.com>
        <B374297A-8298-4CED-8EC0-6A39BDBA5F05@vmware.com>
        <20190111151525.tf7lhuycyyvjjxez@treble>
        <CAHk-=wjJm8DpCsw=Wno01q4VFqUeiLKE8QmbAtUJurYhn3jRqA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190111200420.qtyffayxceysoarf@treble>
        <CAHk-=whLu9kG3dqgXUkCrNrTp0NVtdOOWxvonXTfhtq-krXo+Q@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190111203135.5clurevf34bkiy3o@treble>
        <CAHk-=whKabsg3N4uHHFkHXXf_mi6=T2OvkC-OUNG8Lt-bsCjFg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190111212210.veyfn5vvjswcwacm@treble>
        <6B0B7437-0577-4FE7-A0BC-EFB5D94B8C21@vmware.com>
        <20190111214122.dzye2mg32aksuyo3@treble>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:41:22 -0600
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> > I don’t see RCU-sched solves the problem if you don’t disable preemption. On
> > a fully preemptable kernel, you can get preempted between the push and the
> > call (jmp) or before the push. RCU-sched can then finish, and the preempted
> > task may later jump to a wrong patched-dest.  
> 
> Argh, I misspoke about RCU-sched.  Words are hard.
> 
> I meant synchronize_rcu_tasks(), which is a completely different animal.
> My understanding is that it waits until all runnable tasks (including
> preempted tasks) have gotten a chance to run.

Not quite, but does the same thing. It waits for all tasks to either
schedule voluntarily (not preempted), or be / go into idle, or be /go
into userspace. In any case, it makes sure code is off of trampolines.
I use this before freeing trampolines used by ftrace.

-- Steve