mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: pca953x: use a per instance irq_chip structure
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:31:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116093158.2850-2-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116093158.2850-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

When a system has two PCA953x GPIO expanders, the kernel complains with:

gpio gpiochip2: (0-0021): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.

Indeed, there is a single instance of "struct irq_chip" that gets
re-used for both PCA953x instance. This commit moves the "struct
irq_chip" to be part of the "struct pca953x_chip", so that we have one
"struct irq_chip" per PCA953X instance.

As part of this, the name of the irq_chip is also made different on a
per-instance basis, now using the dev_name() of the I2C device. This
changes what is visible in /proc/interrupts.

Before:

 47:          0          0   pca953x  10 Edge      e0100000.sdhci cd
 48:          0          0   pca953x   6 Edge      e0101000.sdhci cd

After:

 47:          0          0    0-0020  10 Edge      e0100000.sdhci cd
 48:          2          0    0-0020   6 Edge      e0101000.sdhci cd

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index 4f91ce497dd1..de52f63863db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ struct pca953x_chip {
 	u8 irq_stat[MAX_BANK];
 	u8 irq_trig_raise[MAX_BANK];
 	u8 irq_trig_fall[MAX_BANK];
+	struct irq_chip irq_chip;
 #endif
 
 	struct i2c_client *client;
@@ -594,16 +595,6 @@ static void pca953x_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 	chip->irq_trig_fall[d->hwirq / BANK_SZ] &= ~mask;
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip pca953x_irq_chip = {
-	.name			= "pca953x",
-	.irq_mask		= pca953x_irq_mask,
-	.irq_unmask		= pca953x_irq_unmask,
-	.irq_bus_lock		= pca953x_irq_bus_lock,
-	.irq_bus_sync_unlock	= pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
-	.irq_set_type		= pca953x_irq_set_type,
-	.irq_shutdown		= pca953x_irq_shutdown,
-};
-
 static bool pca953x_irq_pending(struct pca953x_chip *chip, u8 *pending)
 {
 	u8 cur_stat[MAX_BANK];
@@ -699,6 +690,7 @@ static int pca953x_irq_setup(struct pca953x_chip *chip,
 			     int irq_base)
 {
 	struct i2c_client *client = chip->client;
+	struct irq_chip *irq_chip = &chip->irq_chip;
 	int reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
 	int ret, i;
 
@@ -737,7 +729,15 @@ static int pca953x_irq_setup(struct pca953x_chip *chip,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret =  gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&chip->gpio_chip, &pca953x_irq_chip,
+	irq_chip->name = dev_name(&chip->client->dev);
+	irq_chip->irq_mask = pca953x_irq_mask;
+	irq_chip->irq_unmask = pca953x_irq_unmask;
+	irq_chip->irq_bus_lock = pca953x_irq_bus_lock;
+	irq_chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock = pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+	irq_chip->irq_set_type = pca953x_irq_set_type;
+	irq_chip->irq_shutdown = pca953x_irq_shutdown;
+
+	ret =  gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&chip->gpio_chip, irq_chip,
 					   irq_base, handle_simple_irq,
 					   IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -746,8 +746,7 @@ static int pca953x_irq_setup(struct pca953x_chip *chip,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&chip->gpio_chip, &pca953x_irq_chip,
-				    client->irq);
+	gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&chip->gpio_chip, irq_chip, client->irq);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-16  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16  9:31 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: pca953x: reduce indentation level in pca953x_irq_setup() Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16  9:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-01-21 13:06   ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: pca953x: use a per instance irq_chip structure Linus Walleij
2019-01-21 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: pca953x: reduce indentation level in pca953x_irq_setup() Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190116093158.2850-2-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®