From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075A8C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD4A20855 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728436AbfAQWT4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:19:56 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40444 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727451AbfAQWTz (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:19:55 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F8747DF; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:19:53 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Federico Vaga Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: doc: stable-api-nonsense missing link Message-ID: <20190117151953.2ab38ecc@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <3122599.2K0FN2NGh9@harkonnen> References: <3122599.2K0FN2NGh9@harkonnen> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:14:08 +0100 Federico Vaga wrote: > in this document > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst > > there is this note: > > > > Is it possible to get it fixed with the proper link? I searched for it without > success. If that comment is impossible to find I will send a patch to remove > that note, but first I wanted to ask you if you know where to get it. That sounds like a question for Greg (copied). Given that this document predates the Git era, though, I suspect that whatever reference that was meant to be is long since lost. jon