From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5941CC43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6B920855 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sMddgaa1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728056AbfAQVf2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:35:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:43035 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726809AbfAQVf2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:35:28 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w73so5441551pfk.10; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J1I6zXpaKjVach8x1gD1fvxRJO7nOaBCJzi8PJw5XQg=; b=sMddgaa1UIynrH+3FdSYdxlecKM1BNmycphsmW58acwCLxSWAIyHgoPv1ZWVzIslhc DaWhuTl654PhXcQa/XV0i4RtG04b3XVz+J3vQALq+Xm2+/MiXtPJLAvqzhgOIOUlVnXk 92WvkeE+E8/fjI9O2MfywQfeWYBWPK5dyZdriokLJckBfbblj737/ASgWsFy2CY4Cp+N VNE1ReZMAz7EaT0hBZf3EGxVwxP0SOQjEBtQsoejc2/MJUThqnC1sf58pHsv+/vMKJAu 3TY1x4a7S7OJDAVVtWw72QfQFgE/SUOJSX8+WjO9w0tRz5xGQnzPdUbT+sGIkMDkkK5l Un7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J1I6zXpaKjVach8x1gD1fvxRJO7nOaBCJzi8PJw5XQg=; b=Xogc0qFN+iwGmMqG0lGwKkjacCmGGHPCZILJ42J0Ctj1wvXvOtVXQg5By52EOt44kP sEXYDLOCuaU5O17C9Uk+a1Y01rjGlH4+eDfSHybf8llB909ZQDAsWemUf2jMTqNH/f6L TIV+AhwIy+InjQHpBeawLBl+8+3C3N6ztpsWBWmglf/W17+hEtrfqjLHRvcY4vHaES9e AfN5jVSDd/baLeNXbrHcnlf32MBnHjfO5b5ZHjXBlVTprCfnYBSFaMMw9Vt7VrK2gGyw Jfk42tsiTxpl8+MQUV/bDp/L9ViE8P63BxA+zQ7gYyb8TmNrF53DTLyLkdAJFsFVuEcT X6NA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcpnW9Bf0HnILG2BwXTdsGkh6IO2YK1M8kokBB+ujasbeqP2jCD p8VKScqiIDrv+qKWfOrFsbQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4EPknLV7PmbXjfMN/snYbmRUatVp0fQ1lLcssu/j8+k7wfvLonoauYw2XTS0leMVAMXCxC/A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ff16:: with SMTP id k22mr15113776pgi.244.1547760927008; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c23sm3445322pfi.83.2019.01.17.13.35.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:24 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ming Lei , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Omar Sandoval Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16 Message-ID: <20190117213524.GA26237@roeck-us.net> References: <20190116173838.042db659@canb.auug.org.au> <20190116203547.GA788@roeck-us.net> <20190117084902.GA20220@ming.t460p> <20190117103553.GB23565@ming.t460p> <20190117183254.GA17361@roeck-us.net> <10619062-9531-e843-1620-7518e27583f8@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10619062-9531-e843-1620-7518e27583f8@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:34:01AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/17/19 11:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Guenter, > >>> > >>> Could you share me the .config? > >> > > Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work. > > > >> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please > >> feel free to try the following patch: > >> > >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2 > >> > > Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine. > > The patches were pulled, I think Ming would still appreciate it if > you could test the previous tree with that patch on top. > next-20190116 with Ming's patch added and "sh: generate uapi header and syscall table header files" reverted: Qemu test results: total: 343 pass: 343 fail: 0 Note though that my tests do not run any block device stress tests. Guenter