From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCC1C282C0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA3F218CD for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="lQPfiXuQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728410AbfAYNbI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:31:08 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:45278 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726095AbfAYNbH (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:31:07 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0PDStLg144917; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:30:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=w+Tbrak8NRSq80u8Gl2lHN7PCgbvb6uW2B8p1WKzfbM=; b=lQPfiXuQwmiM1Lq54zneOmbrRsgtSQJgp2w1F/0eLx/ubLFZl5BU9mWo6pCIYN+qkEsj Gs6IU1QBk/msupsJDvS0u+fp5ZjFmuWec5PuN4xWTofeyWkz1qvTYbrSgHJdJJNJTuy1 ugOzR0pAaBknc9NroUhCwFCfhoLtcR3/0RUsLa5bclWWam7VS9M7Uazoujw1BsS+mT9T zv5fBw/FcpkDG+wQyGrH7mljgRrscHTIjFoiR4X17NoPjYu4mUqQJuFndJXfW7oNhS42 JjLjE2YKnp+07Q2F9OW7fhm8OGqW85lqVHeXdwIhd0BW+u/p2KviiW3f02eJMj6N8HDW SQ== Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2q3uav5urm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:30:55 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0PDUsvB010029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:30:55 GMT Received: from abhmp0004.oracle.com (abhmp0004.oracle.com [141.146.116.10]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0PDUstd019793; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:30:54 GMT Received: from kadam (/41.202.241.12) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 05:30:53 -0800 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:30:44 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Gao Xiang Cc: Chao Yu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu , LKML , weidu.du@huawei.com, Fang Wei , Miao Xie Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: erofs: complete POSIX ACL support Message-ID: <20190125133044.GC1795@kadam> References: <20190125115103.47250-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190125120104.15604-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190125120104.15604-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9146 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=798 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901250111 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 08:01:04PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Let's add .get_acl() to read the file's acl > from its xattrs to make POSIX ACL usable. > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang > --- > This [PATCH 2/2] currently hasn't tested, please ignore temporarily... > I will test it asap... This is an awkward thing. Just don't send it until after you test it. We also ignore RFC patches so if you mark it as RFC that will be ignored if you want. regards, dan carpenter