From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Whitchurch <rabinv@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: Add panic-fatal-signals
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:05:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128100545.b62193aa8f49e1de8d6ea8b7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190128084959.13060-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:49:59 +0100 Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> wrote:
> Add a sysctl which asks the kernel to panic when any userspace process
> receives a fatal signal which would trigger a core dump. This has
> proven to be quite useful when debugging problems seen during testing of
> embedded systems: When combined with kernel core dumps (saved due to
> the panic), it allows easier debugging of crashes which have their
> origin in system-wide problems such as buggy drivers or other kernel or
> hardware-related issues.
>
> The crashing process's core dump can be extracted from the kernel core
> dump using tools such as the crash utility's gcore extension.
>
I can't speak to the usefulness of this, but the feature is small and
simple.
Some documentation would be appreciated. I assume in
Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt. Please also check that
print-fatal-signals is appropriately documented while we're in there -
it's documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst but
not Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt.
> v2: Put the sysctl behind a config option
I suppose so... The option is root-only (surely?) so I'm not sure this
is really needed.
> ...
>
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1242,6 +1242,20 @@ config SYSCTL_SYSCALL
>
> If unsure say N here.
>
> +config SYSCTL_PANIC_FATAL_SIGNALS
> + bool "panic-fatal-signals sysctl" if EXPERT
> + depends on PROC_SYSCTL
> + help
> + If you say Y here, a kernel.panic-fatal-signals sysctl will be
> + offered. If this sysctl is turned on, the kernel will panic if any
> + userspace process receives a fatal signal which would trigger a core
> + dump.
> +
> + When used together with kernel core dumps, this can be useful for
> + debugging some system-wide problems, primarily on embedded systems.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
I suggest that the Kconfig help and the forthcoming documentation
should clearly explain the dangers of enabling this!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 8:49 Vincent Whitchurch
2019-01-28 18:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-01-30 14:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-01-30 15:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2019-01-30 16:29 ` Vincent Whitchurch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128100545.b62193aa8f49e1de8d6ea8b7@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rabinv@axis.com \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome