From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D6BC169C4 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4503E21473 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sweptlaser-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@sweptlaser-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="wM1NavwZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729621AbfA2V3b (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:29:31 -0500 Received: from mail-it1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:50255 "EHLO mail-it1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729498AbfA2V3b (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:29:31 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f195.google.com with SMTP id z7so6998321iti.0 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:29:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sweptlaser-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id; bh=jyGeuZdc33uN3Y2UHU7KUY8NrBL/9m1Ao71O/HzCaGE=; b=wM1NavwZOrfvMJjQWqjBkM+xRasHVLFyPGWDDCIDqEbUlIG5MTppDx9Kc6jDcjcAyr ioJStNW8mHzgBIUvOWOmwIsIaZPEeEjTOxXgWzzYbxuroVs8wFUTVzpbesrX+jWAyeL2 P1GA9TR6Qw9KUrZ92cnpwjrOYYWcFUIunYTbEPB44B9tHZUc6EoRaCrAnFblAzFKz4Vn YuAme6fccf6fe5y8gTyguNfGtRtlhDye9hS9VvBprsp+jI504qL4ULuqwgEUu8zM9+xm pFAxC8HNd0Tpb+pQt7jMJPqGG1Cwqq1r8iMyi7FqBhg9wSznKKBRBGqqSCfeespJRthS XrHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id; bh=jyGeuZdc33uN3Y2UHU7KUY8NrBL/9m1Ao71O/HzCaGE=; b=LpSSN3SBndK4yIpXgM7bV4US1Pg5594QNStTGYyCsaVkrKa52bSZSmq7R+TxB7Zdcn CJcddUMzZR6YCigEzNCgL5nyd4q/JXqZ0ocZbWOSaLK2wJNZqBAvI+a4eOkJyV6AhotQ 8kUdHLbyI48FRWRcoaxMg3H0UHKJQRNOSPDb8KUb5z2lA9QQbIABav9xT21AGFQ3mIq9 OYstJUj98R876CsRKmzqvBxgYekgSi5O6m1VFJBpTuAX+JVz/QWw7cUTIo8cT8939fcY qbV8gR+46jgEe6WRsjgaSoaE9DOs72lyiVec5zBeTkJ2nrKw8gsjOOt4R0diacE8vsRL o1wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeT/i7n1r1xJ9YNrstYW8GV2yfKYrV6k9UD3d/mIEYsKoU7LTMF NC9pDYUQQExadK5EKGFKedgSFQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7HQ46tFTjavDwgXDr7N9rbhp/wahuFvv6g6da6slw6MOYbVqku1Y+7WUxGEvXjEv7r/yjbiw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:a50:: with SMTP id j16mr12631034itl.52.1548797370380; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from yngvi.hq.sweptlaser.com ([63.147.146.226]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n16sm14787776iom.58.2019.01.29.13.29.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:29:29 -0800 (PST) From: Jeremy Gebben To: Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] hwmon: (lm85) add LM96000 high freqency pwm support Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:29:17 -0700 Message-Id: <20190129212920.27921-1-jgebben@sweptlaser.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, This patch adds support for the PWM frequencies from 22.5 to 30 kHz available on the LM96000. It looks like this chip has been supported for a long time, but wasn't mentioned in the docs (which I have updated). Also, it has been using the generic 'lm85' prefix, which I have not changed to avoid breaking userspace or device tree files. AFAICT, lm85_detect() will only return 'lm85' for LM96000 chips, so it doesn't look like you can get a bare 'lm85' prefix with any other chips. I stumbled on to a 10 year old thread discussing a patch which looks like an early attempt to add support for this chip, which may be of interest: https://lm-sensors.lm-sensors.narkive.com/1SIwaMDT/patch-hwmon-lm96000-support Thanks for reviewing, Jeremy Jeremy Gebben (3): hwmon: (lm85) remove freq_map size hardcodes hwmon: (lm85) Document the LM96000 as supported hwmon: (lm85) add support for LM96000 high frequencies Documentation/hwmon/lm85 | 9 ++++++++- drivers/hwmon/lm85.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1