From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Peng Donglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:57:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131135744.GB21965@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130193348.GC20667@kroah.com>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:33:48PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:21:02PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > > never do something different based on this.
> > >
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Peng Donglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h | 9 +++------
> > > arch/arm64/mm/dump.c | 4 ++--
> > > arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c | 7 ++-----
> > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > Are you taking this via your tree, or would you like us to queue it in
> > arm64?
>
> What ever is easiest for you is fine with me, I can handle it either
> way, just let me know.
It's easy enough for us to merge the arm64 bits, so we'll pick that up for
5.1.
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-22 14:41 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: cleanup debugfs usage Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-22 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-25 18:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-30 18:21 ` Will Deacon
2019-01-30 19:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-31 13:57 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-01-22 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-22 21:25 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-23 9:42 ` Laura Abbott
2019-01-22 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: omap1: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-22 23:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-01-22 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: omap2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-22 23:06 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190131135744.GB21965@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®