From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F87C282D8 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB18321872 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730745AbfBAQLT (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:11:19 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35660 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726172AbfBAQLT (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:11:19 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CBC2E68D93; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:11:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:11:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , John Crispin , Vinod Koul , Dmitry Tarnyagin , Nicolas Ferre , Sudip Mukherjee , Felipe Balbi , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] smc911x: pass struct device to DMA API functions Message-ID: <20190201161116.GG6532@lst.de> References: <20190201084801.10983-1-hch@lst.de> <20190201084801.10983-11-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:14:34PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > And equivalently for rxdma here. However, given that this all seems only > relevant to antique ARCH_PXA platforms which are presumably managing to > work as-is, it's probably not worth tinkering too much. I'd just stick a > note in the commit message that we're still only making these > self-consistent with the existing dma_map_single() calls rather than > necessarily correct. Sounds good.