From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA48C282D8 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 23:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5672A2148D for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 23:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726700AbfBAXPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 18:15:36 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:33540 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725803AbfBAXPf (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 18:15:35 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC31F2BD; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 23:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:15:33 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Joel Nider , Leon Romanovsky , Doug Ledford , Mike Rapoport , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] update infiniband uverbs documentation Message-ID: <20190201161533.5000ad95@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190201165252.GA13002@ziepe.ca> References: <1548151235-386-1-git-send-email-joeln@il.ibm.com> <20190201165252.GA13002@ziepe.ca> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:52:52 -0700 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Doc folks, what is the feedback on these patches? Should I take > them through the rdma tree? If you think they are ready (it seemed that there were still comments on one of the patches?) I'll take them, just let me know. Thanks, jon (aka "doc folks" :)