From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, andy@infradead.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell_rbu: stop abusing the DMA API
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 18:16:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202171659.GA3324@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190201231559.GC105752@fedora.eng.vmware.com>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:15:59PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> > not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
> > is correct given that it is BIOS-related and that is a good source
> > of insanity. In that case we should not use dma_alloc_coherent with
> > a NULL device to allocate memory, but use GFP_DMA32 to stay under
> > the 32-bit BIOS limit.
>
> + Mario re bios related physical address - is Christoph's assumption
> correct?
>
> Christoph, did you observe a failure? If so, we should probably also
> tag for stable.
No, I've been auditing for DMA API (ab-)users that don't pass a
struct device. Generally the fix was to just pass a struct device
that is easily available. But dell_rbu doesn't actually seem to
be a "device" in the traditional sense, and the way it uses the
DMA API is really, really odd - it first does a virt_to_phys on
memory allocated from the page allocator (so works with physical
addresses in that case) and the retries with a dma_alloc_coherent
with a NULL argument, which in no way is guaranteed to you give
you something else, although for the current x86 implementation
will give you the equivalent of a GFP_DMA32 page allocator allocation
plus virt_to_phys.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 7:34 Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 18:28 ` Stuart Hayes
2019-02-01 23:17 ` Darren Hart
2019-02-01 23:15 ` Darren Hart
2019-02-02 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-02-07 20:47 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190202171659.GA3324@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome