Re: [PATCH] signal: always allocate siginfo for SI_TKILL

[Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>]

On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 09:49:38PM -1000, Jack Andersen wrote:
> The patch titled
> `signal: Never allocate siginfo for SIGKILL or SIGSTOP`
> created a regression for users of PTRACE_GETSIGINFO needing to
> discern signals that were raised via the tgkill syscall.
> 
> A notable user of this tgkill+ptrace combination is lldb while
> debugging a multithreaded program. Without the ability to detect a
> SIGSTOP originating from tgkill, lldb does not have a way to
> synchronize on a per-thread basis and falls back to SIGSTOP-ing the
> entire process.
> 
> This patch allocates the siginfo as it did previously whenever the
> SI_TKILL code is present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jack Andersen <jackoalan@gmail.com>

The  commit you're trying to fix has been discussed before wrt to
seccomp tests:

commit 2bd61abead58c82714a1f6fa6beb0fd0df6a6d13
Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu Dec 6 15:50:38 2018 -0800

    selftests/seccomp: Remove SIGSTOP si_pid check

    Commit f149b3155744 ("signal: Never allocate siginfo for SIGKILL or SIGSTOP")
    means that the seccomp selftest cannot check si_pid under SIGSTOP anymore.
    Since it's believed[1] there are no other userspace things depending on the
    old behavior, this removes the behavioral check in the selftest, since it's
    more a "extra" sanity check (which turns out, maybe, not to have been
    useful to test).

    [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5jJaZAOzP1qFz66tYrtbuywqb+UN2SOA1VLHpCCOiYvYeg@mail.gmail.com

    Reported-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
    Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
    Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>

Ccing Kees on this. Seems that this commit might be worth given that
there's some parts of userspace relying on it and not just internal
kernel tests.

Christian