From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3254C282C4 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673172083B for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727656AbfBEAIF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 19:08:05 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50502 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726657AbfBEAIF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 19:08:05 -0500 Received: from X1 (c-24-6-103-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.103.156]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A41FA9AD2; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:08:03 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Chang S. Bae" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Markus T Metzger , Ravi Shankar , LKML , Linux Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] kbuild: Raise the minimum required binutils version to 2.21 Message-Id: <20190204160803.cbb2a196652df40b6dff5220@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20190201205319.15995-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> <20190201205319.15995-4-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 18:45:44 -0800 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:54 PM Chang S. Bae wrote: > > > > It helps to use some new instructions directly in inline assembly. > > akpm, can you ack this patch? AFAIK you are the only, or at least > most vocal, user of ancient userspace to build new kernels. Are you > okay with this? Acked-by: Andrew Morton That little initiative got beaten into submission :(