From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E9EC282CB for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CAA217F9 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=crapouillou.net header.i=@crapouillou.net header.b="bLg0Lq0j" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727432AbfBEDww (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:52:52 -0500 Received: from outils.crapouillou.net ([89.234.176.41]:54440 "EHLO crapouillou.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725900AbfBEDww (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:52:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crapouillou.net; s=mail; t=1549338770; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=OiDLL6/XkCX4PH5wOG5uANFiN9Hh85FWVObphrnvWNU=; b=bLg0Lq0jh6yjc0YaXwEKaHbUMflff5uhzxWzSdFU44ZrnJM1kU99QxVgh/JDsOp5GKb/rQ fmKSEp7HPqcVAd/WL4YthYvUif16cv6YjvvXlkQnuaaE37AdPPQ/PSTTCXre4KZPBNLsx5 jVQf+22JD0gpz11hazQGKodFQN3zcB8= From: Paul Cercueil To: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Boris Brezillon Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Ingenic JZ47xx NEMC patchset V3 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:52:36 -0300 Message-Id: <20190205035240.31410-1-paul@crapouillou.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Since the V2 of my patchset I could test it on the JZ4740, and see that the hardware is the exact same as on the JZ4725B. As the JZ4740 is already fully upstream, and also older, I now add support for the JZ4740 instead of the JZ4725B. The only patches modified since v2 are the 1/4 and 4/4, and the change is a dumb rename of '4725b' into '4740', so I kept the Reviewed-by: for these two. I hope it's OK. Cheers, -Paul