From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Skip LLC nohz logic for asymmetric systems
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:14:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206161452.GL17550@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117153411.2390-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:34:11PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The LLC nohz condition will become true as soon as >=2 CPUs in a
> single LLC domain are busy. On big.LITTLE systems, this translates to
> two or more CPUs of a "cluster" (big or LITTLE) being busy.
>
> Issuing a nohz kick in these conditions isn't desired for asymmetric
> systems, as if the busy CPUs can provide enough compute capacity to
> the running tasks, then we can leave the nohz CPUs in peace.
>
> Skip the LLC nohz condition for asymmetric systems, and rely on
> nr_running & capacity checks to trigger nohz kicks when the system
> actually needs them.
>
> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 291dfdb0183f..ff27bf56e8d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9545,6 +9545,17 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
> }
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity))
> + /*
> + * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
> + * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
> + * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
> + *
> + * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
> + */
> + goto check_capacity;
> +
> sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> if (sds) {
> /*
Since (before this) the actual order of the various tests doesn't
matter, it's a logical cascade of conditions for which to KICK_MASK.
We can easily reorder and short-circuit the cascase like so, no?
The only concern is if sd_llc_shared < sd_asym_capacity; in which case
we just lost a balance opportunity. Not sure how to best retain that
though.
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9568,25 +9568,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
}
rcu_read_lock();
- sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
- if (sds) {
- /*
- * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
- * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
- * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
- * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
- * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
- * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
- * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
- */
- nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
- if (nr_busy > 1) {
- flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
- goto unlock;
- }
-
- }
-
sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
if (sd) {
/*
@@ -9600,6 +9581,20 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
}
}
+ sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
+ if (sd) {
+ /*
+ * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
+ * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
+ if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
+ flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu));
if (sd) {
/*
@@ -9610,21 +9605,36 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
goto unlock;
}
+
+ /*
+ * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
+ * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
+ * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
+ *
+ * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
+ */
+ goto unlock;
}
- sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
- if (sd) {
+ sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+ if (sds) {
/*
- * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
- * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+ * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
+ * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
+ * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
+ * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
+ * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
+ * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
+ * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
*/
- for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
- if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
- flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
+ if (nr_busy > 1) {
+ flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+ goto unlock;
}
+
}
+
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-17 15:34 [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: NOHZ cleanups and misfit improvement Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and for asym-packing nohz kicks Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:50 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Simplify nohz_balancer_kick() tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Explain LLC nohz kick condition Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:51 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Prune nohz_balancer_kick() comment block Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:51 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Prune, fix and simplify the " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Tune down misfit nohz kicks Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-06 17:25 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-07 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Skip LLC nohz logic for asymmetric systems Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-06 17:26 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-07 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-07 11:31 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: NOHZ cleanups and misfit improvement Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206161452.GL17550@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome