From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB00EC169C4 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1372073F for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726727AbfBGASH (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:18:07 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:35550 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725959AbfBGASG (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:18:06 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52BA49AE; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 00:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:18:05 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Federico Vaga Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc:it_IT: add translations in process/ Message-ID: <20190206171805.52c73f6e@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20190119221341.3622-1-federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> <20190120185617.44a7f275@lwn.net> <2146324.8BP4ZdZamE@pcbe13614> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 23:55:38 +0100 Federico Vaga wrote: > I am having a look at this document and I am wandering if this is an > useful > document? Clearly I see value in the table with all requirements > summarised, > but I do not see it for the rest of the document. > > So, I propose to actually rename change.rst to requirements.rst and > remove > everything but the requirements chapter and the links. Removing obsolete information is fine with me. I'd resist the temptation to rename the file, though; people haven't forgiven us yet for the last round of renaming, and this is a relatively well-known name. Thanks, jon