From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC24C169C4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 21:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171F8218B0 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 21:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="XR+jEie+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726958AbfBFVWc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:22:32 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:52932 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725983AbfBFVWc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:22:32 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BCEF100DD8CA670FB4D187A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bce:f100:dd8c:a670:fb4d:187a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 816BA1EC0586; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:22:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1549488150; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=C+YkTlw+vDGbmKozFBkEC9gkJ2lauWYajkpGTfJXtPc=; b=XR+jEie+q+bVO4mW+6hmr73tnIBCDATW0uYIQLcK7hz1Xe+Rb4iSGV9Jtpm/wGuHdy++Mn J8tNd9ZwC0y6cGqXwzjTPlmE5F7C3/RH/f6Plib9CS45RvaqKRM741i0wAmTo2GJHpQFL0 TCOZEvg+Y5immA+kmO6YqqGApU5ShzQ= Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:22:18 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tony Luck , Linux Edac Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm) Message-ID: <20190206212218.GJ7314@zn.tnic> References: <20190206170000.286b1f53@canb.auug.org.au> <3f095f3e-ace0-aadb-ead1-01908da5c08c@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f095f3e-ace0-aadb-ead1-01908da5c08c@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=y > but CONFIG_EDAC_SKX is not set. > since # CONFIG_ACPI is not set > > Should EDAC_I10NM depend on ACPI also? This should do it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d6a9f7336d925364daca00557afa59a68e78b422 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.