Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Remove rebase-detritus in VCPI helper kernel-docs

[Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:31:01PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Looks like when making the final revision of:
> 
> 022debad063e ("drm/atomic: Add drm_atomic_state->duplicated")
> 
> I forgot to remove some of the comments that I had added to
> drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() and drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
> that were no longer valid due to us having removed the state->duplicated
> checks from each function. This also introduced an error while building
> the docs with sphinx:
> 
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:3100: WARNING: Inline literal
> start-string without end-string.
> 
> So, fix that by just removing the kerneldoc comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>

> Fixes: 022debad063e ("drm/atomic: Add drm_atomic_state->duplicated")
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 5a99135d39cd..dc7ac0c60547 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3097,10 +3097,6 @@ static int drm_dp_init_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>   * @port as needed. It is not OK however, to call this function and
>   * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() in the same atomic check phase.
>   *
> - * When &drm_atomic_state.duplicated is set to %true%, this function will not
> - * perform any error checking and will instead simply return the previously
> - * recorded VCPI allocations.
> - *
>   * See also:
>   * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
>   * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
> @@ -3185,11 +3181,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots);
>   * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() on the same @port in a single atomic check
>   * phase.
>   *
> - * When &drm_atomic_state.duplicated is set, this function will not
> - * modify the VCPI allocations in &drm_dp_mst_topology_state.vcpis, so that
> - * those VCPI allocations may be restored as-is from the duplicated state. In
> - * this scenario, this function will always return 0.
> - *
>   * See also:
>   * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
>   * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS