Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] i2c:ocores: add polling interface

[Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1501 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:31:20AM +0100, Federico Vaga wrote:
> This driver assumes that an interrupt line is always available for
> the I2C master. This is not always the case and this patch adds support
> for a polling version.
> 
> Report from Andrew Lunn:
> 
>   I did some timing tests for this. On my box, we request a udelay of
>   80uS. The kernel actually delays for about 79uS. We then spin in
>   ocores_wait() for an additional 10-11uS, which is 3 to 4 iterations.
> 
>   There are actually 9 bits on the wire, not 8, since there is an
>   ACK/NACK bit after the actual data transfer. So i changed the delay to
>   (9 * 1000) / i2c->bus_clock_khz. That resulted in ocores_wait() mostly
>   not looping at all. But for reading an 4K AT24 EEPROM, it increased
>   the read time by 10ms, from 424ms to 434ms. So we should probably keep
>   with 8.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> 

Fixed these checkpatch warnings:

WARNING: 'transfered' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transferred'?
#111: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c:306:
+		 * We wait for the data to be transfered (8bit),

CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#129: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c:324:
+
+

WARNING: 'transfered' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transferred'?
#154: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c:349:
+			break; /* all messages have been transfered */

and applied to for-next, thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]