From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86031C169C4 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB20218D8 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733066AbfBKP7n (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:59:43 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58072 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730149AbfBKP7k (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:59:40 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5762868DD6; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:59:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:59:38 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joerg Roedel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tom Lendacky , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] dma-iommu: cleanup dma-iommu.h Message-ID: <20190211155938.GA27745@lst.de> References: <20190114094159.27326-1-hch@lst.de> <20190114094159.27326-3-hch@lst.de> <3f78b779-4360-1204-e942-39a8a81759c7@arm.com> <20190201161305.GI6532@lst.de> <5bf081c2-2b8c-d3d1-c93e-468c8f3cef67@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5bf081c2-2b8c-d3d1-c93e-468c8f3cef67@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:08:26PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Other than dma-iommu.c itself, none of them *require* it - only arch/arm64 > selects it (the one from MTK_IOMMU is just bogus), and a lot of the drivers > also build for at least one other architecture (and/or arm64 with > !IOMMU_API). > > Either way, I have no vehement objection to the change, I just don't see > any positive value in it. I've moved the idef back down below the includes.