From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: iproc: Add CRS check in config read
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:12:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212181208.GA918@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549342622-9929-2-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 10:27:00AM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> In the current implementation, config read output data 0xffff0001 is
> assumed as CRS completion. But sometimes 0xffff0001 can be a valid data.
>
> IPROC PCIe host controller has a register to show config read request
> status flags like SC, UR, CRS and CA. So that extra check is added to
> confirm the CRS using status flags before reissue config read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> index c20fd6b..b882255 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@
> #define APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT 0
> #define APB_ERR_EN BIT(APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT)
>
> +#define CFG_RD_SUCCESS 0
> +#define CFG_RD_UR 1
> +#define CFG_RD_CRS 2
> +#define CFG_RD_CA 3
> #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS 0xffff0001
> #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US 500000 /* 500 milliseconds */
>
> @@ -289,6 +293,9 @@ enum iproc_pcie_reg {
> IPROC_PCIE_IARR4,
> IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4,
>
> + /* config read status */
> + IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS,
> +
> /* link status */
> IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS,
>
> @@ -350,6 +357,7 @@ static const u16 iproc_pcie_reg_paxb_v2[] = {
> [IPROC_PCIE_IMAP3] = 0xe08,
> [IPROC_PCIE_IARR4] = 0xe68,
> [IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4] = 0xe70,
> + [IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS] = 0xee0,
So, with the *current* code, on controllers that does not support this
register you won't be able to get any HW whose config space register
value reads 0xffff0001 to work, is that correct ?
Lorenzo
> [IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS] = 0xf0c,
> [IPROC_PCIE_APB_ERR_EN] = 0xf40,
> };
> @@ -474,10 +482,12 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_ep_cfg_reg(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> return (pcie->base + offset);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> +static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> + void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> {
> int timeout = CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US;
> unsigned int data;
> + u32 status;
>
> /*
> * As per PCIe spec r3.1, sec 2.3.2, CRS Software Visibility only
> @@ -498,6 +508,15 @@ static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> */
> data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> while (data == CFG_RETRY_STATUS && timeout--) {
> + /*
> + * CRS state is set in CFG_RD status register
> + * This will handle the case where CFG_RETRY_STATUS is
> + * valid config data.
> + */
> + status = iproc_pcie_read_reg(pcie, IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS);
> + if (status != CFG_RD_CRS)
> + return data;
> +
> udelay(1);
> data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> }
> @@ -576,7 +595,7 @@ static int iproc_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> if (!cfg_data_p)
> return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>
> - data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(cfg_data_p);
> + data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(pcie, cfg_data_p);
>
> *val = data;
> if (size <= 2)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-05 4:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add IPROC PCIe new features Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: iproc: Add CRS check in config read Srinath Mannam
2019-02-12 18:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-02-13 3:57 ` Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: iproc: Add PCIe 32bit outbound memory configuration Srinath Mannam
2019-02-12 18:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-13 4:51 ` Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add IPROC PCIe new features Srinath Mannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190212181208.GA918@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®