mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: iproc: Add CRS check in config read
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:12:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212181208.GA918@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549342622-9929-2-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 10:27:00AM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> In the current implementation, config read output data 0xffff0001 is
> assumed as CRS completion. But sometimes 0xffff0001 can be a valid data.
> 
> IPROC PCIe host controller has a register to show config read request
> status flags like SC, UR, CRS and CA. So that extra check is added to
> confirm the CRS using status flags before reissue config read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> index c20fd6b..b882255 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@
>  #define APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT		0
>  #define APB_ERR_EN			BIT(APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define CFG_RD_SUCCESS			0
> +#define CFG_RD_UR			1
> +#define CFG_RD_CRS			2
> +#define CFG_RD_CA			3
>  #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS		0xffff0001
>  #define CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US	500000 /* 500 milliseconds */
>  
> @@ -289,6 +293,9 @@ enum iproc_pcie_reg {
>  	IPROC_PCIE_IARR4,
>  	IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4,
>  
> +	/* config read status */
> +	IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS,
> +
>  	/* link status */
>  	IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS,
>  
> @@ -350,6 +357,7 @@ static const u16 iproc_pcie_reg_paxb_v2[] = {
>  	[IPROC_PCIE_IMAP3]		= 0xe08,
>  	[IPROC_PCIE_IARR4]		= 0xe68,
>  	[IPROC_PCIE_IMAP4]		= 0xe70,
> +	[IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS]	= 0xee0,

So, with the *current* code, on controllers that does not support this
register you won't be able to get any HW whose config space register
value reads 0xffff0001 to work, is that correct ?

Lorenzo

>  	[IPROC_PCIE_LINK_STATUS]	= 0xf0c,
>  	[IPROC_PCIE_APB_ERR_EN]		= 0xf40,
>  };
> @@ -474,10 +482,12 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_ep_cfg_reg(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
>  	return (pcie->base + offset);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> +static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> +					 void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
>  {
>  	int timeout = CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US;
>  	unsigned int data;
> +	u32 status;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * As per PCIe spec r3.1, sec 2.3.2, CRS Software Visibility only
> @@ -498,6 +508,15 @@ static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
>  	 */
>  	data = readl(cfg_data_p);
>  	while (data == CFG_RETRY_STATUS && timeout--) {
> +		/*
> +		 * CRS state is set in CFG_RD status register
> +		 * This will handle the case where CFG_RETRY_STATUS is
> +		 * valid config data.
> +		 */
> +		status = iproc_pcie_read_reg(pcie, IPROC_PCIE_CFG_RD_STATUS);
> +		if (status != CFG_RD_CRS)
> +			return data;
> +
>  		udelay(1);
>  		data = readl(cfg_data_p);
>  	}
> @@ -576,7 +595,7 @@ static int iproc_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>  	if (!cfg_data_p)
>  		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>  
> -	data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(cfg_data_p);
> +	data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(pcie, cfg_data_p);
>  
>  	*val = data;
>  	if (size <= 2)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05  4:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add IPROC PCIe new features Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: iproc: Add CRS check in config read Srinath Mannam
2019-02-12 18:12   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-02-13  3:57     ` Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: iproc: Add PCIe 32bit outbound memory configuration Srinath Mannam
2019-02-12 18:37   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-13  4:51     ` Srinath Mannam
2019-02-05  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add IPROC PCIe new features Srinath Mannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190212181208.GA918@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®