From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com, tj@kernel.org,
longman@redhat.com, johannes.berg@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v7 21/23] block: Avoid that flushing triggers a lockdep complaint
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214230058.196511-22-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214230058.196511-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Avoid that running test nvme/012 from the blktests suite triggers the
following false positive lockdep complaint:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
ksoftirqd/1/16 is trying to acquire lock:
000000000282032e (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
but task is already holding lock:
00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/16:
#0: 00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x90
__lock_acquire.cold.45+0x2b4/0x313
lock_acquire+0x98/0x160
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0
blk_mq_complete_request+0x76/0x110
nvmet_req_complete+0x15/0x110 [nvmet]
nvmet_bio_done+0x27/0x50 [nvmet]
blk_update_request+0xd7/0x2d0
blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x100
blk_flush_complete_seq+0xe5/0x350
flush_end_io+0x12f/0x1d0
blk_done_softirq+0x9f/0xd0
__do_softirq+0xca/0x440
run_ksoftirqd+0x24/0x50
smpboot_thread_fn+0x113/0x1e0
kthread+0x121/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
block/blk-flush.c | 5 ++++-
block/blk.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 6e0f2d97fc6d..86c86c76c087 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include "blk.h"
#include "blk-mq.h"
@@ -472,7 +473,8 @@ struct blk_flush_queue *blk_alloc_flush_queue(struct request_queue *q,
if (!fq)
goto fail;
- spin_lock_init(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
+ lockdep_register_key(&fq->key);
+ spin_lock_init_key(&fq->mq_flush_lock, &fq->key);
rq_sz = round_up(rq_sz + cmd_size, cache_line_size());
fq->flush_rq = kzalloc_node(rq_sz, flags, node);
@@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ void blk_free_flush_queue(struct blk_flush_queue *fq)
if (!fq)
return;
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&fq->key);
kfree(fq->flush_rq);
kfree(fq);
}
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 848278c52030..10f5e19aa4a1 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct blk_flush_queue {
* at the same time
*/
struct request *orig_rq;
+ struct lock_class_key key;
spinlock_t mq_flush_lock;
};
--
2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 23:00 [PATCH v7 00/23] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] locking/lockdep: Fix two 32-bit compiler warnings Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:02 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size (1/2) Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:03 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size (2/2) Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:03 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] locking/lockdep: Avoid that add_chain_cache() adds an invalid chain to the cache Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:04 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 05/23] locking/lockdep: Reorder struct lock_class members Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:05 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entries Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:05 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] locking/lockdep: Initialize the locks_before and locks_after lists earlier Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:06 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] locking/lockdep: Split lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:07 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftest Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:07 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 10/23] locking/lockdep: Update two outdated comments Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:08 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:09 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] locking/lockdep: Reuse list entries " Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:09 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] locking/lockdep: Introduce lockdep_next_lockchain() and lock_chain_count() Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:10 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] locking/lockdep: Fix a comment in add_chain_cache() Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:11 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] locking/lockdep: Reuse lock chains that have been freed Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:11 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:12 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] locking/lockdep: Verify whether lock objects are small enough to be used as class keys Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:13 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-02-26 17:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28 7:13 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:14 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] locking/spinlock: Introduce spin_lock_init_key() Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-02-15 2:26 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] block: Avoid that flushing triggers a lockdep complaint Ming Lei
2019-02-15 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-17 13:23 ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 1:35 ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 15:53 ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] lockdep tests: Fix run_tests.sh Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:15 ` [tip:locking/core] lockdep/lib/tests: " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-14 23:00 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] lockdep tests: Test dynamic key registration Bart Van Assche
2019-02-28 7:15 ` [tip:locking/core] lockdep/lib/tests: " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-02-21 22:02 ` [PATCH v7 00/23] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-02-22 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-22 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-22 22:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214230058.196511-22-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome