From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC96C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC502070D for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727011AbfBVMts (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:49:48 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43943 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726087AbfBVMts (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:49:48 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id BB8E768CEC; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:49:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:49:46 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , PowerPC , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the dma-mapping tree Message-ID: <20190222124946.GA29125@lst.de> References: <20190222091728.6d3d9877@canb.auug.org.au> <87ef80pjwy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ef80pjwy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:43:41PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in: > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c > > > > between commit: > > > > cfced786969c ("dma-mapping: remove the default map_resource implementation") > > > > from the dma-mapping tree and commit: > > > > 68005b67d15a ("powerpc/dma: use the generic direct mapping bypass") > > > > from the powerpc tree. > > > > I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > > particularly complex conflicts. > > Thanks. > > Christoph, I've put the powerpc dma changes in a topic branch if you > want to merge it to reduce the conflicts. Up to you. Thanks. I think the conflicts are pretty harmless as we are mostly removing code entirely in the powerpc tree that the dma-mapping tree touches.